User talk:Wojciech G

Hi everyone,please feel free to edit my talk page! Wojciech G (talk) 12:56, 2 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! Mgasparin (talk) 00:11, 1 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

February 2020

Hello, I'm Flyer22 Frozen. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —specifically this edit to Mii—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help desk. Thanks. Flyer22 Frozen (talk) 21:42, 3 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. -- ferret (talk) 19:01, 4 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Wojciech G (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I did it by an accident , it will not happen again. sorry wikipedia Wojciech G (talk) 19:24, 5 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

This unblock request has been declined due to your history of vandalism and/or disruption to this encyclopedia. However, we are willing to give you another chance provided that you can earn back the trust of the Wikipedia community. To be unblocked you need to demonstrate that you are willing and able to contribute positively to Wikipedia. You can do this by:

Familiarizing yourself with our basic rules.
Read our guide to improving articles.
Pick any pre-existing article you wish to improve.
If you have trouble choosing an article to improve, see this index of articles needing improvement for ideas. Once you have decided on the article you will propose improvements to:
1. Click the Edit tab at the top of that article;
2. Copy the portion of the prose from that article that you will be proposing changes to. However:
  - do not copy the "infobox" from the start of the article (i.e., markup like this: {{infobox name|...}});
  - do not copy any image placement code (i.e., markup like this: [[File:Name.jpg|thumb|caption]]);
  - do not copy the page's categories from the bottom of the page (i.e., markup like this: [[Category:Name]]);
  - do not copy the stub tag (if there) from the bottom of the page (i.e., markup like this: {{Foo stub}});
3. Click edit at your talk page, and paste at the bottom under a new section header (like this: == [[Article title]] ==) the copied content but do not save yet;
4. Place your cursor in the edit summary box and paste there an edit summary in the following form which specifies the name of the article you copied from and links to it (this is required for mandatory copyright attribution): "Copied content from [[exact Name of Article]]; see that article's history for attribution."
5. You can now save the page. However, if your edits will include citations to reliable sources (which they should), add the following template to the end of your prose: {{reflist-talk}}. Once you have added the template, click Publish changes.
Now, edit that content. Propose significant and well researched improvements by editing the selected portion of the article. Please note that we are not looking for basic typo corrections, or small unreferenced additions; your edits should be substantial, and reflect relevant policies.
When you are done with your work, re-request unblocking and an administrator will review your proposed edits.
- If we (including the original blocking admin) are convinced that your proposed edits will improve Wikipedia as an encyclopedia, you will be unblocked.

If you need help while working with your proposed edits, you may add "{{Help me|your question here ~~~~}}" to your talk page. Thank you. Yamla (talk) 19:33, 5 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Blocked for sockpuppetry

This account has been blocked indefinitely from editing for sock puppetry per evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Wojciech G. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted. If you believe that this block was in error, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. ST47 (talk) 00:13, 17 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I don't understand what you mean by sockpuppeting? Anyway I will tell the origin of my accounts on wiki. My first account was blocked because I was using wikipedia on kindle browser but it was soooooo laggy that I went mad and typed in for the article mii 'when a mii's asshole stays the same the body changes colour'. A day later I got banned because of putting in the word 'asshole' into the article. So then I created a another account called Wojciech 2020 and that old account was left behind. 11 days later I got banned again because I logged in on my PC,phone and kindle so I got banned for sockpuppeting my old account because the beginning of the accounts were the same so anyway please remove the ban because I own Wojciech G and this current account and the ban was from my old account. Please remove the ban because I own the both accounts. Wojciech G (talk) 11:18, 17 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You've been given a path forward. Follow it. --Yamla (talk) 11:40, 17 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I don't understand what you mean by given a path forward? Does that mean that I am unlocked now? If so respond to me. Wojciech G (talk) 13:49, 17 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

No. Scroll up and read the declined unblock request. Search for "To be unblocked you need to demonstrate that you are willing and able to contribute positively to Wikipedia". That explains your path forward, that explains what you must do to earn back the trust of the community. If you are unwilling to do that, please say so. Note this will all but certainly mean nobody will be willing to unblock you. --Yamla (talk) 18:13, 17 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock

{unblock | reason=your reason here I was caught sockpuppeting myself but is that even possible for sockpuppeting yourself

Anyway Wojciech 2020 was caught sockpuppeting me but I got the ban. Please unblock me as soon as possible. Wojciech G (talk) 22:06, 17 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please read WP:SOCK. And as I've already said, please explicitly say you are rejecting the path you were offered to be unblocked. Or alternatively, follow the instructions you've been given. You get one more edit. --Yamla (talk) 22:12, 17 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

So that means that I can edit again or reword the unblock request? Wojciech G (talk) 22:20, 17 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You are either trolling or so manifestly unable to demonstrate the required level of competence that I have revoked your talk page access. This leaves you with WP:UTRS. Before taking advantage of UTRS, read every single thing that's been written to you here. Explain specifically how you plan to "demonstrate that you are willing and able to contribute positively to Wikipedia". Hint: we've given you detailed instructions already to exactly answer that question. Note that if you waste UTRS's time like you've wasted ours, you will find your access there is revoked, too. --Yamla (talk) 22:23, 17 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]