User talk:Wogsland

Here you can post comments on things I have worked on, like

Physics:

BaBar . B-Bbar oscillation . Exotic hadron . Mesonic molecule . Tennessee HEP Group . X(3872) .

History/Biography:

Richard K. Yamamoto . Peter A. Wolff . Alvin M. Weinberg . Léon van Hove . Llewellyn Smith (Physicist) . Robert Selander . Herwig Schopper . Samuel Sachs . Pier Oddone . Gerhard Naeseth . Kevin Muller . Eugen Merzbacher . William G. Mather . Toshihide Maskawa . Plato Malozemoff . Luciano Maiani . Whitney MacMillan . John H. MacMillan . George H. Love . Alexander Legge . Makoto Kobayashi (physicist) . Robert J. Kleberg Erwin Kelm . Willibald Jentschke . Hassan Jawahery . Francis Clark Howell . Paul C. Henshaw . Fred Hassan . C. Michael Harper . Hallvard Graatop . William Fleming . Jonathan M. Dorfan . Michaela Clavell . Louis S. Cates . David Burpee . Horace Bowker . Stephen Birch . Edward Julius Berwind . Hans W. Becherer . Albert Baez . Robert Aymar . John Adams (Physicist) . List of Directors General of CERN . Severin Eskeland . Orri Vigfússon

and others.

Nice work on BaBar page

Good to see that BaBar has a more thorough home page now. Josh Thompson 23:04, 5 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Gerhard_naeseth.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Gerhard_naeseth.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use. Suggestions on how to do so can be found here.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. The Sunshine Man 17:50, 19 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Unfortunately, thats not quite right, why dont you have a look at Template:Non-free media rationale and see its fields of what to add there, that should help you organise what needs to be added. Happy editing! The Sunshine Man 15:07, 20 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use disputed for Image:Gerhard naeseth.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Gerhard naeseth.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 18:32, 13 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Kevin Muller

A tag has been placed on Kevin Muller, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia per CSD A7.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not meet basic Wikipedia criteria may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as an appropriate article, and if you can indicate why the subject of this article is appropriate, you may contest the tagging. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the article and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm its subject's notability under the guidelines.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag) and leave a note on the page's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. B1atv 16:09, 7 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Kevin Muller

A tag has been placed on Kevin Muller, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia per CSD A7.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not meet basic Wikipedia criteria may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as an appropriate article, and if you can indicate why the subject of this article is appropriate, you may contest the tagging. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the article and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm its subject's notability under the guidelines.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag) and leave a note on the page's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. B1atv 17:33, 7 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

October 2007

Welcome to Wikipedia. Please do not remove speedy deletion tags from articles that you have created yourself, as you did with Kevin Muller. If you do not believe the article should be deleted, then please place {{hangon}} on the page (please do not remove any existing speedy deletion tag) and make your case on the article's talk page. Administrators will look at your reasoning before deciding what to do with the article. Thank you. Please do not re-create speedy deletion templates. Administrators can delete an article even IF an article creator places {{hangon}} on the article if the article meets the criteria for speedy deletion. Recreating deleted articles and removing speedy deletion templates is considered to be vandalism. B1atv 17:40, 7 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
The next time you remove a speedy deletion notice from an article, as you did with Kevin Muller, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. B1atv 17:41, 7 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Kevin Muller

A tag has been placed on Kevin Muller, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia per CSD A7.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not meet basic Wikipedia criteria may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as an appropriate article, and if you can indicate why the subject of this article is appropriate, you may contest the tagging. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the article and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm its subject's notability under the guidelines.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag) and leave a note on the page's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. B1atv 17:42, 7 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Kevin Muller

Kevin Muller, an article you created, has been nominated for deletion. We appreciate your contributions. However, an editor does not feel that Kevin Muller satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in the nomination space (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and the Wikipedia deletion policy). Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kevin Muller and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Kevin Muller during the discussion but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Mr.Z-man 18:04, 7 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked

You have been temporarily blocked from editing Wikipedia for repeated vandalism. When the block expires you are free to continue editing if you intend to make useful contributions. However, if you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, this account will be subject to a longer block.

- Philippe | Talk 19:38, 7 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

So that's how admins of Wikipedia make sure they get their way. Blocking users. Why the Hell do I contribute to this site?Wogsland 19:47, 7 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

To respond to the email that you sent me: I blocked you for horribly incivil edit comments, and I stand by that block. - Philippe | Talk 02:12, 8 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Unreferenced BLPs

Hello Wogsland! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 3 of the articles that you created are tagged as Unreferenced Biographies of Living Persons. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to ensure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. If you were to bring these articles up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current 291 article backlog. Once the articles are adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the list:

Eugen Merzbacher - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Herwig Schopper - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Robert Aymar - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 06:38, 25 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked Indefinitely

The account you created has been blocked indefinitely because its username is a blatant violation of our username policy – it is obviously profane; threatens, attacks or impersonates another person; or suggests that your intention is not to contribute to the encyclopedia (see our blocking and username policies for more information). We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia, but users are not allowed to edit with inappropriate usernames, and trolling or other disruptive behavior is not tolerated. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. TN X Man 17:27, 24 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Paul C. Henshaw

The article Paul C. Henshaw has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Not notable

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Mccapra (talk) 03:18, 15 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Peter A. Wolff for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Peter A. Wolff is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Peter A. Wolff until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Abishe (talk) 04:23, 6 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who accepted the request.

Wogsland (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

My username is my real last name that I have had for my entire life. If you want to verify that it's a real name, please have a look at my published work in peer reviewed journals: https://inspirehep.net/literature?sort=mostrecent&size=25&page=1&q=a%20wogsland. Wogsland (talk) 12:31, 25 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Accept reason:

This looks accurate to me. As the blocking admin hasn't edited since 2012, I have taken the liberty of lifting your block. Welcome back! Yamla (talk) 12:48, 25 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Liv Kristin Rønnekleiv moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Liv Kristin Rønnekleiv, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Celestina007 (talk) 13:46, 25 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Severin Eskeland (1977-)

The article Severin Eskeland (1977-) has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp/dated}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Celestina007 (talk) 13:50, 25 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Godt Brød moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Godt Brød, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Lopifalko (talk) 06:17, 5 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This article met the standard for inclusion in the Norwegian version of Wikipedia, so I'm not sure what the translation is lacking. There are 3 citations. If more are needed, how many more? I've submitted it for review. Wogsland (talk) 06:39, 5 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Godt Brød (September 2)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Noahfgodard was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Godt Brød and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Godt Brød, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Noahfgodard (talk) 00:25, 2 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Wogsland! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Noahfgodard (talk) 00:25, 2 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve Severin Eskeland (director)

Hello, Wogsland,

Thank you for creating Severin Eskeland (director).

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

IMDb is not considered a reliable source. See WP:UGC; it would be helpful to have at least one reliable source in English.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Whiteguru}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Whiteguru (talk) 07:38, 3 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Severin Eskeland (director) moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Severin Eskeland (director), does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Mccapra (talk) 20:49, 4 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Liv Kristin Rønnekleiv

Hello, Wogsland. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Liv Kristin Rønnekleiv".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 19:48, 21 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Severin Eskeland (disambiguation)

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Severin Eskeland (disambiguation) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G14 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a disambiguation page which either

disambiguates only one extant Wikipedia page and whose title ends in "(disambiguation)" (i.e., there is a primary topic);
disambiguates zero extant Wikipedia pages, regardless of its title; or
is an orphaned redirect with a title ending in "(disambiguation)" that does not target a disambiguation page or page that has a disambiguation-like function.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time. Please see the disambiguation page guidelines for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 08:59, 16 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Godt Brød

Hello, Wogsland. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Godt Brød".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 02:24, 2 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Severin Eskeland (director)

Hello, Wogsland. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Severin Eskeland".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 05:34, 5 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:Meson.gif

The file File:Meson.gif has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unused, superseded by File:Meson.svg.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. --Minorax^«¦talk¦» 16:26, 23 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

"Michaela Clavell" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect Michaela Clavell has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 July 23 § Michaela Clavell until a consensus is reached. –LaundryPizza03 (d c̄) 07:35, 23 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Michaela Clavell for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Michaela Clavell is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Michaela Clavell until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

–LaundryPizza03 (d c̄) 17:08, 23 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]