User talk:Wob-Wob

Welcome from Ioeth

Welcome!

Hello, Wob-Wob, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, like Scene Queen, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines for page creation, and may soon be deleted (if it hasn't already).

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on your user page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Ioeth _{(talk contribs friendly)} 19:36, 26 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The article Silvermoon City has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This was done because the article seemed to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it did not indicate how or why the subject is notable, that is, why an article about that subject should be included in Wikipedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert notability may be deleted at any time. If you can indicate why the subject is really notable, you are free to re-create the article, making sure to cite any verifiable sources.

Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, and for specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. NawlinWiki 13:28, 15 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Ss10-thumb.jpg

Thank you for uploading Image:Ss10-thumb.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Shyam ^(T/C) 06:34, 29 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Ss7-thumb.jpg

Thank you for uploading Image:Ss7-thumb.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Shyam ^(T/C) 06:34, 29 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Ss1-thumb.jpg

Thank you for uploading Image:Ss1-thumb.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Shyam ^(T/C) 06:35, 29 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Klootviolen

A tag has been placed on Klootviolen, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia per speedy deletion criterion A7.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not meet basic Wikipedia criteria may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as an appropriate article, and if you can indicate why the subject of this article is appropriate, you may contest the tagging. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the article and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm its subject's notability under the guidelines.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Martijn Hoekstra 20:01, 1 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

List of countries by number of mobile phones in use

Uit deze bewerking maakte ik op dat het probleem was dat sommige informatie uit 2005 is en sommige informatie uit 2007. Dat maakt het inderdaad lastig om er een peil op te trekken, maar dat betekent niet dat er sprake is van "some mistakes", omdat alle gegevens op zich vermoedelijk kloppen, of in ieder geval een eind in de goede richting zijn. Daarom heb ik de zin over "some mistakes" verwijderd.
Vwb het 2e punt, de ~100%: in sommige landen zijn er inderdaad meer mobiele telefoons dan mensen. Niet iedereen heeft een telefoon, maar er zijn voldoende mensen die 2 of meer telefoons hebben (privé, reserve, van de zaak, enzovoort). Waarschijnlijk zoals er in Nederland ongeveer evenveel fietsen als mensen zijn, en zoals er in Nieuw-Zeeland meer schapen dan mensen zijn. Het kan ook zijn dat er net iets minder mobiele telefoons dan mensen zijn, 99,99...enz. procent. In dat geval is het handiger om te zeggen ~100%. A ecis^Brievenbus 23:23, 11 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

merging accounts

Unfortunately, you can't merge two existing accounts. You can only rename your old account to a new name, but you have already started editing under your new name, so you can't do that. Just leave a link on your user page to your old account, if you want people to know that you have edited under that name. --Enric Naval (talk) 01:48, 2 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]