User talk:Wme.1997

Wme.1997, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Wme.1997! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Missvain (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:02, 5 February 2019 (UTC)

Welcome!

Hello, Wme.1997, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of your recent edits to the page Rangoon (2017 Hindi film) did not conform to Wikipedia's verifiability policy, and may have been removed. Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations that have been stated in print or on reputable websites or in other media. Always remember to provide a reliable source for quotations and for any material that is likely to be challenged, or it may be removed. Wikipedia also has a related policy against including original research in articles.

If you are stuck and looking for help, please see the guide for citing sources or come to the new contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask a question on your talk page. Again, welcome. - Arjayay (talk) 14:14, 6 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

February 2019

Welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate your contributions, but in one of your recent edits to Passengers (2016 film), it appears that you have added original research, which is against Wikipedia's policies. Original research refers to material—such as facts, allegations, ideas, and personal experiences—for which no reliable, published sources exist; it also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 02:58, 8 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Instead of using passive voice ("it was cited as a box office disappointment"), please cite your sources and tell us who called a film a "box office disappointment". For example: "Variety called it a box office disappointment", not "it was called a box office disappointment". NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 03:00, 8 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or change content, as you did at The Favourite, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 05:06, 10 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]