User talk:WlKlCZECH11
May 2024
[edit]
Hi WlKlCZECH11! I noticed that you have reverted to restore your preferred version of Cameron Stewart several times. The impulse to undo an edit you disagree with is understandable, but I wanted to make sure you're aware that the edit warring policy disallows repeated reversions even if they are justifiable.
All editors are expected to discuss content disputes on article talk pages to try to reach consensus. If you are unable to agree at Talk:Cameron Stewart, please use one of the dispute resolution options to seek input from others. Using this approach instead of reverting can help you avoid getting drawn into an edit war. Thank you. Sariel Xilo (talk) 02:01, 8 May 2024 (UTC)
- I have removed defamatory statements that cite tabloids or provide zero citation, because it violates Wikipedia’s policy on defamation of a living person. Rsparkles (talk) 02:04, 8 May 2024 (UTC)
- It does not cite tabloids; it cites industry outlets. Are you responding here because WlKlCZECH11 is an alt account of your's? Sariel Xilo (talk) 02:07, 8 May 2024 (UTC)
- They are blogs with unverified sources, not industry outlets. The articles references Twitter posts that have been deleted. Blogs are not industry outlets. Rsparkles (talk) 02:11, 8 May 2024 (UTC)
- Why are you responding on their behalf? Are you Wlklczech11? Wiiformii (talk) 02:16, 8 May 2024 (UTC)
- No I am not. This simply clearly violates Wikipedia’s defamation rules of a living person. Rsparkles (talk) 02:17, 8 May 2024 (UTC)
- Why are you responding on their behalf? Are you Wlklczech11? Wiiformii (talk) 02:16, 8 May 2024 (UTC)
- They are blogs with unverified sources, not industry outlets. The articles references Twitter posts that have been deleted. Blogs are not industry outlets. Rsparkles (talk) 02:11, 8 May 2024 (UTC)
- It does not cite tabloids; it cites industry outlets. Are you responding here because WlKlCZECH11 is an alt account of your's? Sariel Xilo (talk) 02:07, 8 May 2024 (UTC)