User talk:Wkpdsrnm2023

This is my first topic

So that the topic link stops being red. Wkpdsrnm2023 (talk) 05:29, 24 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Mass rv without explanation

These edits aren't vandalism, it is explained clearly in each edit summary. Please don't revert whole changes again and making barely any explanation. That's a lot of work. At least revert only part you don't agree with. The languages ain't official and are not national languages, either; the wording is very clear on this - "government-sponsored" languages and nothing more. Please add your fix to the sub-section that mention the languages. Brllo (talk) 03:14, 7 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

There are already complaints about you in the talk page in regards to your prior history with the same article. You are deleting massive amounts of data and should wait until an administrator decides what to do with you. Wkpdsrnm2023 (talk) 03:22, 7 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I already provided rationale for those complaints on their page and they don't respond anymore, it's just minor debate. The removed data has problems in which I mentioned and explained in each edit summary. If administrator decide it's a debate and not vandalism, I will restore the changes. If you object any part, please provide clear rationale for it. Brllo (talk) 03:30, 7 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I will revert them back, then. You should wait for an administrator to decide. Wkpdsrnm2023 (talk) 03:32, 7 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

An administrator just decided that the edits are not vandalism, and just normal content dispute. I will restore the changes now, if you don't provide rationale for reverting here. Please don't revert again without explanation. Brllo (talk) 03:38, 7 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Which administrator? Wkpdsrnm2023 (talk) 03:40, 7 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

In the request for increasing protection page. Your request is declined. Brllo (talk) 03:41, 7 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, well in that case you can revert it. My edit to the capital and largest city section is the one edit I was concerned about. The talk page is where it goes now, but I won't revert your edits anymore. Wkpdsrnm2023 (talk) 03:47, 7 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I'm so happy you were blocked. It's disgusting how many sockpuppets you have and how much time you waste destroying good information. I hope nothing but bad things for you, you complete disgrace. Wkpdsrnm2023 (talk) 04:25, 11 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

June 2023

Hi Wkpdsrnm2023! I noticed that you have reverted to restore your preferred version of Bolivia several times. The impulse to undo an edit you disagree with is understandable, but I wanted to make sure you're aware that the edit warring policy disallows repeated reversions even if they are justifiable.

All editors are expected to discuss content disputes on article talk pages to try to reach consensus. If you are unable to agree at Talk:Bolivia, please use one of the dispute resolution options to seek input from others. Using this approach instead of reverting can help you avoid getting drawn into an edit war. Thank you. Moxy- 04:27, 5 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Sudan Religion and Demographics Editng

Can you guys kindly stop editing the religion section of Sudan. 97% of Sudan's population is Sunni Muslim. The pew research center estimates for religion in Sudan are false, and multiple sources including Minority Rights Group and the CIA world factbook profile on Sudan report that 97% of Sudan's population are Sunni Muslim. Armenians also arent the indigenous people of Sudan and there is not a large Armenian community in Sudan presides a few who reside in Khartoum. Nuba and Nubians are different people and they are one of the indigenous people of Sudan, so stop removing Nuba from the section of demographics. Cookiemonster1618 (talk) 14:54, 8 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Do you have any sources for this information or is this all according to you personally? Seems like you just go through dozens of pages and alter numbers to whatever you want. I'll continue to revert whatever you do until start providing sources. Wkpdsrnm2023 (talk) 02:40, 7 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I do in fact have sources

https://minorityrights.org/country/sudan/

https://createinternational.com/sudanese-arabs/ Read both of these sources and it will tell you that Sudanese Arabs are Sunni Muslims and that 97% of the population in general adheres to Islam which includes both Arab and Non Arab groups. Whereas Christians are located in the South near the border with South Sudan or are coptic christians living in major towns in northern sudan.Cookiemonster1618 (talk) 03:55, 7 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You should include them next to the information then, that is if those blogs aren't removed for not being good sources. Wkpdsrnm2023 (talk) 05:11, 7 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ANI

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Beshogur (talk) 10:36, 22 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:38, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]