User talk:Wizlop

Fresh Start. I'll obey the rules fully.

Snopes

I'm willing to overlook the vandalism in your past edits, but if I were you, I'd refrain from adding your personal opinions into the Urban Legends Reference Pages articles. It's really getting old. Discuss changes on the talk page first. Thanks. --Cúchullain ^t/c 07:19, 1 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, Ok then.

Nonsense of DFGHJ

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on DFGHJ, by Seattlenow (talk · contribs), another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because DFGHJ provides no meaningful content or history, and the text is unsalvageably incoherent.

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting DFGHJ, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. --Android Mouse Bot 2 04:58, 28 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

July 2007

Welcome to Wikipedia. An article you recently created, Tiger's Revenge, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines for new articles, so it will shortly be removed (if it hasn't been already). Please use the sandbox for any tests you may want to do and please read our introduction page to learn more about contributing. Thank you. Q ^{T C} 02:32, 29 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Airbomb

A tag has been placed on Airbomb, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia per CSD a1.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not meet basic Wikipedia criteria may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as an appropriate article, and if you can indicate why the subject of this article is appropriate, you may contest the tagging. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the article and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm its subject's notability under the guidelines.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag) and leave a note on the page's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. • Lawrence Cohen 23:04, 22 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Your edits to Buy one get one free

Hi, I noticed that you recently deleted a large amount of viable content from Buy one get one free without providing an edit summary. I am assuming that you meant well with that edit, and am wondering if you could provide me with a reason for deleting that much relevant content?

Please reply on my talk page. Thanks, Robert Skyhawk (Talk) 03:45, 13 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Notability of Bollock Obama

A tag has been placed on Bollock Obama requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article, which appears to be about a real person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), or web content, does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable. If this is the first page that you have created, then you should read the guide to writing your first article.

If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the article (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Theseeker4 (talk) 17:45, 4 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Ruth Abram

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Ruth Abram, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process because of the following concern:

Really not a notable actress.

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Scott Mac (Doc) 22:41, 26 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]