User talk:WizardOfTheNorth
Welcome
[edit]
Welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you enjoy the encyclopedia and want to stay. As a first step, you may wish to read the Introduction.
If you have any questions, feel free to ask me at my talk page — I'm happy to help. Or, you can ask your question at the New contributors' help page.
Here are some more resources to help you as you explore and contribute to the world's largest encyclopedia...
Finding your way around:
Need help?
|
|
How you can help:
|
|
Additional tips...
|
|
Reference sources
[edit]I notice that you have removed reference information from several railway station articles, such as these: Castleton, Manchester Victoria, Oldham Mumps, Oldham Werneth, Rochdale. Why was this? --Redrose64 (talk) 16:25, 7 September 2010 (UTC)
- I have been correcting and expanding a number of entries. One of the issues that arose with corrections of fact was that it was not obvious what the source of the orignal information had been, since there were no inline references. Subsequently one of these errors was traced to a book which had been listed as a general reference. As at least one of the station entries has a correct inline reference to a book, so it seems to me that if books are going to be referenced they should be by that method, and not by a generic reference.WizardOfTheNorth (talk) 12:28, 8 September 2010 (UTC)
- Some articles may contain what may appear to be general references, but which are in fact the second stage of a citation style known as "shortened footnotes", see WP:CITESHORT. This is quite a common method, mainly used where various facts have been drawn from several different pages in the same book, because it saves cluttering up the page with full citations every time. See, for example, Canadian federal election, 1957, which is today's main page featured article. --Redrose64 (talk) 17:03, 8 September 2010 (UTC)
Yes, I have looked at Canadian federal election, 1957 and I note that it contains over 130 inline references. I can see that the use of "shortened footnotes" is desirable for a piece of that length and complexity. What I don't see is the point of using it for entries of only a few lines. The problem remains that if the fairly short entries that I have been editing contain factual errors and only a generic reference, then I see no reason why they should not be replaced by a factual correction with an inline reference. I have already come across a number of instances where incorrect information from Wikipedia entries has been repeated in other media, and its accuracy has been (correctly) challenged so I would say that the priority should be on factual accurancy rather than the style of presentation.WizardOfTheNorth (talk) 19:13, 8 September 2010 (UTC)
Hi Wizard I see you have been editing for some time so you should know we do not use Wikipedia as a reference for Wikipedia. I changed the url to an internal link.--Charles (talk) 17:30, 20 October 2011 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:48, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!
[edit]
Hello, WizardOfTheNorth. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
ArbCom 2017 election voter message
[edit]Hello, WizardOfTheNorth. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message
[edit] | Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message
[edit] | Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |