User talk:Wits

Your edit to Pubic hair

Your recent edit to Pubic hair (diff) was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to recognize and repair vandalism to Wikipedia articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept my humble creator's apologies – if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior. Click here for frequently asked questions about the bot and this warning. // AntiVandalBot 12:52, 23 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The BOT revert was mistaken. I attempted to fix a layout problem specific to the firefox web browser. Wits 12:59, 23 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Pubes

Deleted female pic was better - too bad it was deleted it out. --David Shankbone 16:24, 12 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah. I'm hoping the original uploader of pic will notice deletion, and reinstate it with the proper licensing info. Slim chance, but would be nice.Wits 14:39, 13 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

veg article

Much better - always good to have specific reference too. I guess they call them weasel words cause they sneak in...Bob98133 (talk) 18:54, 17 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]