User talk:Witchinghour
Wikipedia is just not worth being insulted over. Just for adhering to WP policies, being bold, or just for asking a WP Admin, who should have known better, for sources or notability. This page was intentionally blanked by Witchinghour goodbye and goodluck with this project. --Witchinghour 20:59, 10 June 2007 (UTC)
Segger Microcontroller Systems AfD again
[edit]Segger Microcontroller Systems is up for deletion again. You commented before; perhaps you might care to comment again. —EncMstr 17:27, 10 August 2007 (UTC)
Hello. You marked this article for speedy deletion and User:Tone deleted it. But it is notable debugger in some areas. Can anybody restore article? `a5b 14:36, 18 September 2007 (UTC)
From criterias for speedy deletion: "Note that simply having a company or product as its subject does not qualify an article for this criterion." I ask User:Tone for Deletion review. `a5b 14:53, 18 September 2007 (UTC)
VANDAL? A lot of pages was incorrectly marked for db-spam! See contributions. `a5b 15:10, 18 September 2007 (UTC)
Featured sounds
[edit]I noticed that you have participated in Wikipedia:Featured sound candidates in the past. There are now two candidates and the project appears to be abandoned. If you could look at the candidates and vote it would be appreciated. Zginder (talk) (Contrib) 00:57, 8 February 2008 (UTC)
Nomination of Hit 'Em Up for deletion
[edit]
A discussion has begun about whether the article Hit 'Em Up, which you created or to which you contributed, should be deleted. While contributions are welcome, an article may be deleted if it is inconsistent with Wikipedia policies and guidelines for inclusion, explained in the deletion policy.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hit 'Em Up until a consensus is reached, and you are welcome to contribute to the discussion.
You may edit the article during the discussion, including to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. -- PhantomSteve/talk|contribs\ 22:04, 14 October 2010 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:17, 23 November 2015 (UTC)