User talk:Wissie0305

THIS WAS A NEW USER IN MARCH 2018

Please assist Victuallers (talk) 08:10, 2 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Loughborough University

Digital marketing assignment. Do experiment on your user page and in the "sandbox". You can find the link for the sandbox at the top of this page. Remember to sign in at the bottom of the wp:Loughborough University page. Remember that you have guides on "Learn".Here are a few extra links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can alsovisit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! Victuallers (talk) 08:10, 2 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Some baklava for you!

14 edits - getting there Victuallers (talk) 15:35, 7 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ying Ke (March 8)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Robert McClenon was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage (not just mere mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject—see the general guideline on notability, the golden rule and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners and Help:Introduction to referencing/1), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.

The comment the reviewer left was:

It is not entirely clear what this is about. It may be about software that does not establish software notability. It is poorly written, possibly due to a language weakness.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Ying Ke and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Ying Ke, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and save.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Robert McClenon (talk) 04:19, 8 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Wissie0305! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Robert McClenon (talk) 04:19, 8 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Next step

I think you need to write down what this product is in your own words Victuallers (talk) 00:11, 15 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright

Your addition to Moment of truth (marketing) ‎ has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Kuru (talk) 14:15, 10 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I've found identical issues with your additions today at Moment of truth (marketing), ASOS.com, Blackcircles, Customer experience, Ofo (bike sharing), and Ecomom. You've copied material directly from the source, sometimes changing only a word or two, but mostly just pasting the material unaltered into Wikipedia. Please don't do that. Use your own words and sentences and support them with reliable sources, not blogs, promotional material, or search engine redirects. @Victuallers: for your situational awareness. Kuru (talk) 15:00, 10 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the heads up, @Kuru:. Wissie0305 Wikipedia is interested in information in your words. If you cut and paste you are taking someone elses information and claiming it as your own. This is plagiarism. Please do not add to real articles again! Use your sandbox until your work has been checked to show that you wrote it. Victuallers (talk) 18:23, 10 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

March 2018

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add soapboxing, promotional or advertising material to Wikipedia, as you did at Ofo (bicycle sharing), you may be blocked from editing. Sounder Bruce 03:16, 11 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

There are at least three reasons why language such as "your social media strategy plus powerful Google marketing strategy should see multiple lists of real estate agents on Google's top page" should not appear in any Wikipedia article. (1) It is not written from a neutral point of view: what "should" happen is a matter of opinion. (2) It addresses the reader. (3) It treats the article in which it is written as though Wikipedia were an instruction manual or tutorial.
On a completely different matter, please make sure that references you add to articles really support the content that they are attached to. In at least two cases you have given a "reference" which is a link to a web page which contains no mention at all of what you wrote about in the content to which you attached the "reference". The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 17:49, 18 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]