User talk:Wiseowl1111

Speedy deletion nomination of Study Sparkz

Hello Wiseowl1111,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Study Sparkz for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly say why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Phil (talk) 00:46, 23 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I saw your comment on my page. I'd refer you to Wikipedia:Notability_(organizations_and_companies) for an understanding of what to shoot for. Basically the best thing is to show coverage in several, independent sources. I think it is good for them to have changed it to a deletion discussion rather than a speedy deletion, if you can show that the company has been considered notable some other places there would be a strong argument for keeping it. Best wishes. Phil (talk) 06:18, 27 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Study Sparkz for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Study Sparkz is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Study Sparkz until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 05:53, 24 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Managing a conflict of interest

Hello, Wiseowl1111. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places, or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a COI may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic, and it is important when editing Wikipedia articles that such connections be completely transparent. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. In particular, we ask that you please:

avoid editing or creating articles related to you and your family, friends, school, company, club, or organization, as well as any competing companies' projects or products;
instead, you are encouraged to propose changes on the Talk pages of affected article(s) (see the {{request edit}} template);
when discussing affected articles, disclose your COI (see WP:DISCLOSE);
avoid linking to the Wikipedia article or to the website of your organization in other articles (see WP:SPAM);
exercise great caution so that you do not violate Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation (see WP:PAID).

Please take a few moments to read and review Wikipedia's policies regarding conflicts of interest, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, sourcing and autobiographies. Thank you. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 05:14, 27 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]