User talk:WiseOhGuys

January 2022

Hello, I'm Denisarona. Your recent edit(s) to the page Ulrich de Maizière appear to have added incorrect information, so they have been reverted for now. If you believe the information was correct, please cite a reliable source or discuss your change on the article's talk page. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Denisarona (talk) 11:34, 9 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for persistently making disruptive edits. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Donald Albury 17:24, 22 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

WiseOhGuys (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

oral family anecdotes from their cooks and drivers WiseOhGuys (talk) 14:38, 25 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Not currently blocked. But given that unblock request and your previous edits, you'll almost certainly end up indefinitely blocked in short order. Your contributions are inappropriate. Yamla (talk) 14:48, 25 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Do you wish to know more about their cooks and drivers. It is reliable but confidential. WiseOhGuys (talk) 00:22, 27 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please understand that material in Wikipedia articles must comply with a number of policies, including Wikipedia:Verifiability and Wikipedia:No original research, which means that anything that might be challenged must be supported by independent (third-party) published reliable sources. Wikipedia:Neutral point of view also applies to everything in Wikipedia articles, and includes a prohibition on scandal mongering. - Donald Albury 14:15, 27 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked as a sockpuppet

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts as a sockpuppet of User:Ehr1Ros2 per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Ehr1Ros2. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. -- RoySmith (talk) 00:35, 10 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]