Jump to content

User talk:Wisdom-inc

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

HS2 phases

[edit]

Sorry but you can only lose this one. If your purpose is to claim that phase 2b is really phase 3, that statement is OR unless you can produce an RS that agrees. --𝕁𝕄𝔽 (talk) 09:43, 12 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You came here to offer personal gloating. I suggest you try learn how to structure English properly. Wisdom-inc (talk) 23:31, 12 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
How did you reach that conclusion? It is the exact opposite of my intention. End of discussion. --𝕁𝕄𝔽 (talk) 00:14, 13 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
https://policyexchange.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2022/11/HS2-The-kindest-cut-of-all.pdf
They say it has four phases. Wisdom-inc (talk) 19:14, 13 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:51, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Wankel engine

[edit]

Please join the discussion at the Wankel engine talk page. I have removed a lot of the article's claims because they were false, and unreferenced. Anyone may challenge unsourced text with good reasoning, which is exactly what I have done. Please refrain from adding text to articles without citing sources. That is disruptive POV editing – removing unreferenced nonsense and making well-sourced additions is not. Best regards, --Johannes (Talk) (Contribs) (Articles) 18:25, 19 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I do not need a lecture on how Wikipedia works. I stripped away your prejudices, POV and unreferenced text on the Wankel engine page.
Akroyd Stuart invented the compression ignition engine. Enough factual evidence proves that. Wisdom-inc (talk) 18:37, 19 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of edit warring noticeboard discussion

[edit]

Information icon Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you. Johannes (Talk) (Contribs) (Articles) 11:25, 23 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

December 2022

[edit]
Stop icon
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for making personal attacks towards other editors.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here: '''NO''' personal attack was made by me, just a statement of facts. The editor was highly disruptive giving lots of POV, as can be seen in the Wankel engine article. He never engaged in cooperation. No taking it to the Talk Page. Nothing. }}.  Bbb23 (talk) 14:16, 23 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
You have been blocked from editing for abuse of editing privileges in relation to information which has been removed from Wikipedia's public records.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then email the Arbitration Committee at arbcom-en@wikimedia.org.

Administrators: Information which has been oversighted was considered when this block was placed. Therefore the Oversight team or the Arbitration Committee must be consulted before this block can be removed. Administrators undoing oversight blocks without permission from an oversighter risk having their administrator rights removed by the Arbitration Committee (per this announcement).
 -- Cabayi (talk) 17:59, 23 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]