User talk:Wirth.christian

A tag has been placed on Kelly Robertson, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article seems to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable, that is, why an article about that subject should be included in Wikipedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert notability may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, and if you can indicate why the subject of this article is notable, you may contest the tagging. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the page (below the existing db tag) and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm its subject's notability under the guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Betaeleven 00:17, 4 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please remember to sign your talk page edits (such as the one on Talk:Kelly Robertson) with four tildes (~) so that other users can easily contact you. Frickeg 00:21, 4 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please don't delete the {{db-bio}} tag from the Kelly Robertson page. Use the {{hangon}} (like you originally did before you removed them both). Betaeleven 00:31, 4 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Do not simply remove AFD tags from articles as you did at Kelly Robertson. It is considered vandalism. Please be patient and work on the article. The AFD lasts five days, so you have that long to provide indication of sufficient notability. The {{hangon}} tag no longer applies at this point. --DanielCD 00:33, 4 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Understood. I guess I will wait it out.--Wirth.christian 00:35, 4 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

February 2007

Please stop. If you continue removing Articles for deletion notices or comments from articles and Articles for deletion pages, as you did with Kelly Robertson, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. _→AzaToth 00:50, 4 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

please delete Kelly Robertson. I will learn how to properly do a page then re submit. I tried deleting page myself and of course, did not do it right.--Wirth.christian 00:52, 4 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I took care of it. Sorry you had to go through all this, but on the bright side, you probably learned a lot. I hope you decide to stick around and contribute more as you learn the ropes of how Wikipedia works. Good luck! --DanielCD 01:08, 4 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image tagging for Image:Kelly 1.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Kelly 1.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 01:04, 4 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Kelly1.jpg listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Kelly1.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. User:Gay Cdn (talk) (Contr) 00:44, 19 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]