User talk:Wiqi55/2013

Disambiguation link notification for January 14

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Umar's Assurance, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Ibn al-Jawzi (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:37, 14 January 2013 (UTC)

Bin Baz/Lacey

Thread opened at WP:RSN, as discussed. DeCausa (talk) 11:46, 29 January 2013 (UTC)

Islam template

As you noticed, there was some funny business going on. The template might need to be watched for a bit longer. I'm not sure, I just have a feeling based on experience. MezzoMezzo (talk) 07:47, 13 February 2013 (UTC)

Template talk

Hi, User:Wiqi55 i have noted that the edits on Jesus in Islam here are been reverted a number of times although their are only 2 incoming links as here the idea is to use the template that can serve the purpose of infobox as well as navbox and i have tried to dealt with most objections so is it wiser to start a TfD. Please do provide your opinion on this matter. --Ibrahim ebi (talk) 11:47, 7 March 2013 (UTC)

FWIW, I agree that the previous template was useful and looked better. But I'm not sure if this is inline with WP policies on template vs infoboxes (you probably know more about this than me). In any case, sorry for the late reply and thanks for your efforts in improving these templates/articles. Wiqi⁽⁵⁵⁾ 02:32, 15 March 2013 (UTC)

Your edit on article 'Nikah mut'ah' have been reverted

Hi Wiqi55, your edit regarding EI2 at article Nikah Mut'ah have been reverted by User:Suenahrme as part of his 'blanket revert' habit.--Sayed Mohammad Faiz Haider^tc_s 05:37, 10 April 2013 (UTC)

Reverting the deletion of the referenced material

Thanks for reverting the deletion of the referenced material --Johnleeds1 (talk) 20:55, 11 May 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for May 22

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Jesus in Islam, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Peace be upon him (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:28, 22 May 2013 (UTC)

The Random Acts of Kindness Barnstar

		The Random Acts of Kindness Barnstar
		For your contribution in Muhammad article that led to a nice solution -AsceticRosé 14:47, 4 August 2013 (UTC)

Thank you! Wiqi⁽⁵⁵⁾ 08:51, 6 August 2013 (UTC)

Bilal Being A Shia

Thanks for pointing out the error in the source. I have provided book sources. Historical documents from both western and nonwestern sources point out that Bilal never gave Abu Bakr Bay'ah (oath of allegiance). Since he refused to give bay'ah to Abu Bakr he is not considered Sunni. A person like Khalid ibn al-Walid or Umar are considered to be Sunnis because they gave bay'ah to Abu Bakr. In addition, Bilal is seen as a shia of Ali. This term refers to being both a companion of Ali and one who fallows Ali's teachings. Hence he is a Shia. Khalid ibn Waleed is not seen as a shia of Ali because he opposed Ali and did not follow his teachings. Similarly, it would be foolish to say that the Pope is a Lutheran because the Pope does not fallow the teachings of Martin Luther. He is catholic because he fallows the catholic principles. Thanks for pointing out the error in the source. I have provided book sources. Zabranos (talk) 04:52, 31 August 2013 (UTC)

The word "Sunni" does not appear in the infoboxes of Khalid ibn al-Walid or Umar. So for consistency we should also remove "Shi'a" from Bilal. This would also be more accurate as reliable sources do not refer to him as Shi'a. In fact, only one of your sources is reliable, The Medieval Islamic Civilization, and it does not claim that he was a Shi'a. The other sources are just expressing "Shi'a beliefs" and therefore cannot be used for stating objective facts. It's also a long held belief, even in Shi'a circles, that his refusal to give bay'a (assuming it was true) does not imply that he favored Ali (raa) in any way. So for now, I think removing "Shi'a" from the infobox will be more consistent with the other articles you mentioned and more inline with neutral and reliable sources. Wiqi⁽⁵⁵⁾ 21:05, 31 August 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for October 3

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Abbas Wasim Efendi, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Ottoman (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:50, 3 October 2013 (UTC)

House of Wisdom

All you had to do was a slight rewording which I've done. Dougweller (talk) 13:56, 4 October 2013 (UTC)

Peace

Sorry for anything I did toy hurt you. Peace. Zabranos (talk) 00:25, 8 October 2013 (UTC)

November 2013

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Abdullah ibn Saba' may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• In traditional Shi'a sources, Ibn Saba' sometimes figured as an extremist (''[[Ghulat|ghali]]'')). It is said that [[Jafar Sadiq]], the sixth Shia' Imam and the founder of Shi'a Islamic fiqh,

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 22:37, 16 November 2013 (UTC)

Pact of Umar

Hi Wiqi55, thank you for your contributions to the Pact of Umar article. However, I don't think these edits are WP:OR because they come from secondary sources which I cited, but let's work out how they could be better phrased. I'm eager to add quality information in the best way possible. Please respond on my talk page. Thank you. Bucillag234 (talk) 23:05, 20 November 2013 (UTC)

Re-input Changes into Pact of Umar

Hi Wiqi55, per my previous post a week ago regarding the changes on the Pact of Umar, I will be re-inputting my information into the article. Should you have any questions please feel free to respond on my talk page.Bucillag234 (talk) 18:04, 26 November 2013 (UTC)

contribute on khwarazmi talk

I want to thank you from the deepth of my heart for trying to keep wikipedia objective and free from biasied information and articles,

You are hero to mankind , thank you for spreading knowledge in a good matter, If wikipedia only hade more users like you than we would need no books, keep up the good work

P.s. how do you awared awareds, I would like to give you one.,--Siktirgitir (talk) 03:23, 14 December 2013 (UTC)siktirgitir

A barnstar for you!

	The Original Barnstar
	to hard work and try to keep wikipedia free from biasied information and trying to keep articles as objective as possible. For working in a empirical way and and same time beeing diplomatic , detailing out real facts from biasied facts, I awared this banner to you dear Wiqi , keep up the good work, best regards Siktirgitir (talk) 03:31, 14 December 2013 (UTC)

Thank you! Wiqi⁽⁵⁵⁾ 15:46, 15 December 2013 (UTC)