User talk:Wipsenade/Archives/2011/January
 | This is an archive of past discussions with User:Wipsenade. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Grammar errors
I noticed you made a number of changes to Women in Pakistan, and some included errors. Just wanted to let you know I changed a few mistakes you made and would be willing to work with you to make sure your edits are correct. --Rayne117 (talk) 10:50, 5 January 2011 (UTC)
I've removed your speedy delete tag from this article. Firstly the reason you give is not one of the valid reasons listed at WP:CSD and secondly, pages are not speedy deleted based on a notability argument if they survived AfD (as that has established notability once and so any deletion now on those grounds will be controversial). I also removed the AfD tag as this was linking to the old discussion. If you want the article deleted you will need to start another AfD for which you should see the instructions at WP:AfD. Essentially, because there has been a discussion before, you should add {{subst:afdx|2nd}} to athe article rather than {{subst:afd1}}. Dpmuk (talk) 12:55, 7 January 2011 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of User talk:CWii
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on User talk:CWii, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion debate, such as at articles for deletion. Under the specified criteria, where an article has substantially identical content to that of an article deleted after debate, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hang on}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion, or "db", tag; if no such tag exists, then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hang-on tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Crowsnest (talk) 10:25, 11 January 2011 (UTC)
O.K., if he's blocked. I did not note this. If he is, wipe the page out.--Wipsenade (talk) 10:47, 11 January 2011 (UTC)
- I do not think it so important, it is more cosmetic. My apologies for adding all this Twinkle stuff on this on your talk page. -- Crowsnest (talk) 11:01, 11 January 2011 (UTC)
Re-User talk:CWii
No offence taken. It's all O.K., since I don't generaly welcome band or blocked users. Thanks for letting me know he was banned. Good luck.--Wipsenade (talk) 11:09, 11 January 2011 (UTC)
- Thanks for the warm welcome !!! -- Crowsnest (talk) 11:11, 11 January 2011 (UTC)
Banbury
Good job, mate. What a hyper-style job you did there!--82.11.88.228 (talk) 19:45, 24 January 2011 (UTC)