User talk:Wipout20

Welcome!

Hello, Wipout20, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of your recent edits to the page Busch Gardens Tampa has not conformed to Wikipedia's verifiability policy, and has been or will be removed. Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations that have been stated in print or on reputable websites or in other media. Always remember to provide a reliable source for quotations and for any material that is likely to be challenged, or it may be removed. Wikipedia also has a related policy against including original research in articles. Additionally, all new biographies of living people must contain at least one reliable source.

If you are stuck and looking for help, please see the guide for citing sources or come to the new contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask a question on your talk page. Again, welcome. McDoob AU93 20:57, 3 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. I appreciate your enthusiasm for editing Busch Gardens Tampa, but unfortunately there are some problems with your edits. First of all, and most importantly, what you describe as a "major attraction" may not be what another editor calls major. Similarly, what they call a "major attraction" may not be what you call major. This is what we refer to as original analysis, and it's something that is discouraged on Wikipedia.

If you believe this list is important, please discuss it on the article's talk page and build consensus for it. If you have any questions, you can post them here or on the article's talk page. Thanks, and happy editing!

--McDoob AU93 21:11, 3 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, Wipout20. You have new messages at McDoobAU93's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

21:26, 3 August 2015 (UTC)

August 2015

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to Busch Gardens Tampa. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Unfortunately, the park's marketing materials would not be considered reliable enough as the park is trying to promote its attractions. Let's let the reader decide what attractions are "major". -- McDoob AU93 21:38, 3 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

OK I WENT ON MANY DIFFERENT SITES MADE BY PPL AND ALL OF THE ATTRACTIONS I INCLUDED THE ONLY ONE I FORGOT WAS THE RAILWAYS SO LEAVE ME ALONE JERK!!!!

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you make personal attacks on other people. Comment on content, not on fellow editors. McDoob AU93 21:45, 3 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. You appear to be engaged in an edit war with one or more editors according to your reverts at Busch Gardens Tampa. Although repeatedly reverting or undoing another editor's contributions may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Wikipedia this is usually seen as obstructing the normal editing process, and often creates animosity between editors. Instead of edit warring, please discuss the situation with the editor(s) involved and try to reach a consensus on the talk page.

If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to lose editing privileges. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount, and violating the three-revert rule is very likely to lead to a loss of editing privileges. Thank you. NeilN ^{talk to me} 22:19, 3 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

OK so lets get to a consensus what would you like me to make changes to? and plz don't make me change the info about the rides because it is all accurate.

You're probably going to want to start up a discussion on the talk page of the article in question, not your own talk page. There will be more people likely to give their input that way. So, try starting a discussion here. Thanks. Sergecross73 msg me 12:49, 4 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]