User talk:Winsocker

Welcome!

Hello, Winsocker, and welcome to Wikipedia!

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{help me}} on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome!--Biografer (talk) 20:24, 17 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

May 2017

Welcome to Wikipedia. We welcome and appreciate your contributions, but we cannot accept original research. Original research refers to material—such as facts, allegations, ideas, and personal experiences—for which no reliable, published sources exist; it also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. brew crewer (yada, yada) 15:33, 18 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Article Geert Wilders

Hi, thanks for your contributions. You edited one part of the article to say that Fitna means "test of faith in times of trial or situation", but that doesn't make sense to me ("times of situation"?). Did you mean to describe it as "test of faith in times of trial, or sedition" as Wikipedia describes it? --BurritoBazooka If you reply here, please add {{ping|BurritoBazooka}} to your message 00:15, 23 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

To: {{ping|BurritoBazooka}}

Hope I pinged you right. Fitna means "one's faith is being tested" (for example, if they have to urge to cheat on a test, their faith is being tested to see if they are loyal enough not too).

Sometimes fitna is used in terms that "to resist a force trying to break their religion (e.g. someone forcing or peer pressuring you to lie/steal)"

I see you did alot of edits to my corrections which I can understand, I just needed to change the definition because the wiki article stated an incorrect definition which I assumed was Gert Wilders definition of Fitna (which shows is incorrect)

Okay, thanks. It looks like Wikipedia's Visual Editor has trouble with the {{ping}} template, but that is okay. I'll edit the article and then you can look and see if you agree with my edit. --BurritoBazooka If you reply here, please add {{ping|BurritoBazooka}} to your message 01:01, 23 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, I think the actual problem with that {{ping}} is that you copied the source code which includes the <nowiki></nowiki> tags, intended to make the template code display in the rendered version of the page. --BurritoBazooka If you reply here, please add {{ping|BurritoBazooka}} to your message 01:08, 23 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

May 2017

Welcome to Wikipedia. We welcome and appreciate your contributions, including your edits to 2017 Manchester Arena bombing, but we cannot accept original research. Original research refers to material—such as facts, allegations, ideas, and personal experiences—for which no reliable, published sources exist; it also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. The claim about Twitter accounts not being associated with ISIS is unreferenced and seems to be original research. Quasar G ^{t - c} 16:03, 23 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, Winsocker. You have new messages at Talk:2017 Manchester Arena bombing.
Message added 16:39, 23 May 2017 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Quasar G ^{t - c} 16:39, 23 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

However . . .

Hi Winsocker. I saw your edit summary on the use of "however". I thought you might be interested in this discussion, and the references cited there. "However" is an overused word on Wikipedia, so it is best to use it sparingly, and where the contradiction is clear from the text, it is not needed. Best wishes, Kablammo (talk) 00:50, 24 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

May 2017

Please do not add unreferenced or poorly referenced information, especially if controversial, to articles or any other page on Wikipedia about living (or recently deceased) persons, as you did to Katie Hopkins. Thank you. ~ GB fan 02:02, 24 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to RuneScape, you may be blocked from editing. Damirgraffiti |☺What's Up?☺ 05:37, 24 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

General sanctions on Syrian Civil War and Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant

Please read this notification carefully, it contains important information about an administrative situation on Wikipedia. It does not imply any misconduct regarding your own contributions to date.

A community decision has authorised the use of general sanctions for pages related to the Syrian Civil War and the Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant, such as Islamic terrorism in Europe (2014–present), which you have recently edited. The details of these sanctions are described here. All pages that are broadly related to these topics are subject to a one revert per twenty-four hours restriction, as described here.

General sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimise disruption in controversial topic areas. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to these topics that do not adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, our standards of behaviour, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. An editor can only be sanctioned after he or she has been made aware that general sanctions are in effect. This notification is meant to inform you that sanctions are authorised in these topic areas, which you have been editing. It is only effective if it is logged here. Before continuing to edit pages in these topic areas, please familiarise yourself with the general sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.

GreyShark (dibra) 12:34, 24 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Alert

This message contains important information about an administrative situation on Wikipedia. It does not imply any misconduct regarding your own contributions to date.

Please carefully read this information:

The Arbitration Committee has authorised discretionary sanctions to be used for pages regarding the Arab–Israeli conflict, a topic which you have edited. The Committee's decision is here.

Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, our standards of behavior, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. This message is to notify you that sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.

All IP editors, accounts with fewer than 500 edits, and accounts with less than 30 days tenure are prohibited from editing any page that could be reasonably construed as being related to the Arab-Israeli conflict. per WP:ARBPIA3#500/30 .--Shrike (talk) 08:46, 21 June 2017 (UTC)e[reply]

You edited again I/P article [[1]] please don't I will ask admin help if you will edit again.--Shrike (talk) 12:07, 1 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please listen to what Shrike says here. You will be lucky if you are not blocked for you latest edits. Seriously, learn the rules, and wait until you have at least 500 edits outside the IP area before you edit pages regarding the Arab–Israeli conflict. If you have edits you think are urgent, then take that up on the talk page of the relevant article. Huldra (talk) 23:56, 8 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

FYI: your name came up on my watch list, when you edited UN Watch. That article is clearly under ARBPIA, it even has an ARBPIA notice on the talk page. Remember, the ARBPIA notice says: "All articles related to the Arab–Israeli conflict, broadly construed". And broadly seriously means broadly: if anyone say it is under ARBPIA, then it most probably is, Huldra (talk) 20:11, 9 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Allow me to chime in here, you are on the path of being blocked. You have gotten enough warnings and time to stop editing in this area. Sir Joseph ^(talk) 04:57, 9 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

July 2017

Hello, I'm Qzd. Wikipedia is written by people who have a wide diversity of opinions, but we try hard to make sure articles have a neutral point of view. Your recent edit to UN Watch seemed less than neutral to me, so I removed it for now. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Qzd (talk) 07:18, 8 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:

Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment; or
With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button ( or ) located above the edit window.

This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.

Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 12:43, 8 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits

Are violating WP:MOSFLAG (by adding country flags in the infobox) and/or WP:OVERLINK (by linking to country names). Please stop. Giant Snowman 15:59, 9 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Ahh, okay. Will do Winsocker (talk) 16:00, 9 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Winsocker. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]