User talk:Winnie54
| This user is a student editor in University_of_Washington/Online_Communities_(Winter) . |
Welcome to Wikipedia: check out the Teahouse!
[edit]
|
Hello! Winnie54,
you are invited to the Teahouse, a forum on Wikipedia for new editors to ask questions about editing Wikipedia, and get support from peers and experienced editors. Please join us! Liz Read! Talk! 08:35, 14 January 2023 (UTC)
|
Welcome!
[edit]Hello, Winnie54, and welcome to Wikipedia! My name is Ian and I work with Wiki Education; I help support students who are editing as part of a class assignment.
I hope you enjoy editing here. If you haven't already done so, please check out the student training library, which introduces you to editing and Wikipedia's core principles. You may also want to check out the Teahouse, a community of Wikipedia editors dedicated to helping new users. Below are some resources to help you get started editing.
Handouts
|
|---|
|
Additional Resources
|
|
If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to contact me on my talk page. Ian (Wiki Ed) (talk) 16:19, 17 January 2023 (UTC)
Peer Review
[edit]Hi Winnie!
I enjoyed reading the article you chose about the NCAA Division I Women's Golf Championship! I peer reviewed your article and created a sub page with my comments. Caroliner6 (talk) 23:58, 27 January 2023 (UTC)
Hi Winnie! This is halle from com 481 who also peer reviewed your article General info Whose work are you reviewing?
Winnie54
Link to draft you're reviewing 2016 NCAA Division I Women's Golf Championship - Wikipedia Link to the current version of the article (if it exists) 2016 NCAA Division I Women's Golf Championship - Wikipedia Evaluate the drafted changes
What does it do well?
first of all, I think it is so cool and impressive that you started this article in general!
your first/introduction paragraph I think is very strong, it includes great information that introduces what the article is going to be about to do the reader. I think its great you separated the first two paragraphs, and waited until the second paragraph to talk about mens golf.
I am impressed with your sources, and think your citations are well spaced out.
The variety in forms of communicated information is great! I like how you involve texts in paragraphs but also utilize tables and charts and the bracket as well
I think it is important and beneficial to readers that you have a "see also" section with other relevant wikipedia articles.
What are some suggested changes? Why change those? Which change is most important?
for the "regional qualifying tournaments" was everything in that section from the 3rd reference? if not, I would suggest placing citations after each bullet point, in case one of those facts intrigues a reader and they can more easily click on the reference right away and visit it as they are intrigued. This is important for convenience of the reader but also to make sure it follows wikipedia citation guidelines.
do you need to cite anything under the venues section?
I think potentially I would add more detail into the format section, as it doesn't quite feel complete/clear enough from a readers point of view.
Is there anything you saw that you could apply to your own article?
your utilization of the charts and tables and bracket is visually appealing and makes your article more interesting for readers to look at! you have inspired me to incorporate varying ways of visuals into my article as I only edited in text/paragraph form. great work! Hallekerickson (talk) 00:57, 28 January 2023 (UTC)