User talk:Windsova

Hi and welcome to Wikipedia. However, I feel that the article Canadian Pensions and Benefits Institute is not appropriate for Wikipedia. It reads like an advertisement, and is a copyright violation of http://www.cpbi-icra.ca/en/page.ch2?uid=AboutUs . Copyright text or images must not be used on Wikipedia unless the procedures linked below these posting/editing boxes are followed. The subject of your article is probably notable enough, but I'm afraid the article isn't as it stands. If you wish to contest this, please use the hangon tag as mentioned on the tags I've added. If you decide to make a new version (in fresh words), please make sure you give independent references. No forums, blogs or self-published. The company site may be given as a link, but can't be used to establish notability. Peridon (talk) 20:45, 9 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Well done. Now give us a bit more in your own words about the company. Remember that this is an encyclopaedia and you must imagine you are not connected with the business at all. You need references from outside sites. I've added an 'unreferenced' tag which will give you time to add the necessary. Any queries, contact me. PS I've restored your opening bit but taken out the 'work for' - not good... Peridon (talk) 21:33, 9 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation

Thank you for submitting an article to Wikipedia. Your submission has been reviewed and has been put on hold pending clarification or improvements from you or other editors. Please take a look and respond if possible. You can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Michael Greenberg. If there is no response within twenty-four hours the request may be declined; if this happens feel free to continue to work on the article. You can resubmit it (by adding the text {{subst:AFC submission/submit}} to the top of the article) when you believe the concerns have been addressed. Thank you. Bsherr (talk) 18:37, 17 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation

Your article submission has been declined, and Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Michael Greenberg was not created. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer, and please feel free to resubmit once the issues have been addressed. (You can do this by adding the text {{subst:AFC submission/submit}} to the top of the article.) Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! Chzz ► 07:04, 20 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation

Your article submission has been declined, and Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Michael Greenberg was not created. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer, and please feel free to resubmit once the issues have been addressed. (You can do this by adding the text {{subst:AFC submission/submit}} to the top of the article.) Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! Chzz ► 10:10, 22 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation

You recently made a submission to Articles for Creation. Your article has been reviewed and declined; it is now located at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Michael Greenberg. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. Feel free to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved. (You can do this by adding the text {{subst:AFC submission/submit}} to the top of the article.) Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! Pol430 talk to me 17:58, 31 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Michael Greenberg concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Michael Greenberg, a page you created has not been edited in at least 180 days. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace. If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements. If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13. Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 13:46, 10 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your article submission Michael Greenberg

Hello Windsova. It has been over six months since you last edited your article submission, entitled Michael Greenberg.

The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code. Please note, however, that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, copy this code: {{subst:Refund/G13|Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Michael Greenberg}}, paste it in the edit box at this link, click "Save", and an administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. HasteurBot (talk) 16:05, 9 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Canadian Pensions and Benefits Institute

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Canadian Pensions and Benefits Institute requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a company, corporation or organization that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 05:38, 30 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]