User talk:Windhaven

Image tagging for Image:Ashlie Rhey.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Ashlie Rhey.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 01:04, 10 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Unspecified source for Image:Ashlie_Rhey.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Ashlie_Rhey.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 10:35, 14 July 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. MER-C 10:35, 14 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Daisy Power

Would like to request the restoration of the page for Daisy Power. The web series was recently listed among try-able Web serials in The New York Times online blog regarding new media online. http://themedium.blogs.nytimes.com/2008/08/25/and-more-web-serials/ Daisy Power is listed along with "Roomates", "Ask a Ninja", "Break a Leg" and "Squeegees". Thank you for your consideration.

A tag has been placed on Daisy Power requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for web content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. CalendarWatcher (talk) 14:08, 9 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding your "hangon" tag on the above article: the proper way to contest a deletion is to use deletion review, but you will need to show that there was something procedurally wrong with the deletion to have it overturned. The article appears to have been deleted previously because of a lack of sources; you need to find multiple, non-trivial reliable sources to confirm that the subject is notable. Blogs aren't considered reliable, unfortunately. Tony Fox (arf!) 22:20, 19 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

- Sorry, a mere mention of the title in a blog isn't a reliable source confirming notability. NawlinWiki (talk) 20:55, 20 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Unreferenced BLPs

Hello Windhaven! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 1 of the articles that you created is tagged as an Unreferenced Biography of a Living Person. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to ensure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. If you were to bring this article up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current 244 article backlog. Once the article is adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the article:

Ashlie Rhey - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 07:56, 25 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree File:Daisy power.jpg

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Daisy power.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Martin H. (talk) 14:20, 7 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]