User talk:Wimt/Archive/Jul-2007

Adminship

Hello :-) I knew you when I edited as Tellyaddict and have always been impressed with your contributions, I noticed your RfA which is not yet up and running, so just give me a shout when its ready because I'd like to co-nominate you as I think you'd make a great admin. Cheers! The Sunshine Man 19:03, 6 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Just to wish you good luck as it will be ending in the next few minutes. Regards --The Sunshine Man 16:03, 18 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks :-) Will (aka Wimt) 16:19, 18 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Reverting vandalism

No problem. Various users have reverted vandalism on my user page recently, and it's good to be able to pass on the favour. Yours, Bencherlite 17:47, 18 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Congratulations!!!

Yay..You're an Admin.. now you can really abuse the tools.. Well Done.. ...--Comet styles 17:56, 18 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Congratulations, Will! You've essentially passed your RfA, unanimously (I assume the one !vote is disregarded). Anyway, if you ever need any help with the admin tools, feel free to contact me on my talk page, or via email. Nishkid64 (talk) 17:58, 18 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks :-). Will (aka Wimt) 18:14, 18 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You're an Admin!

It is my pleasure to inform you that you are now an admin. Congratulations. You can feel free to do everything you're supposed to do and nothing you're not supposed to do. If you haven't already, now is the time look through the Wikipedia:Administrators' how-to guide and Wikipedia:Administrators' reading list. If you have any questions, feel free to ask me, or at the Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard. -- Cecropia 17:58, 18 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, congratulations! I am proud that you are an admin! Politics rule 18:01, 18 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Congrats squire, 'nuff said! Ryan Postlethwaite 18:03, 18 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Bingo! Have fun, don't get too stressed, if in doubt, shout.... The Rambling Man 18:07, 18 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you very much everyone! :-) Will (aka Wimt) 18:14, 18 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Well done! Comgratulations and best of luck. GDonato (talk) 18:33, 18 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Congrats! Have fun. ;-) Black Falcon ^(Talk) 19:00, 18 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Nice! Good luck! Acalamari 19:29, 18 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Cheers :-) Will (aka Wimt) 20:29, 18 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Congratulations on your promotion, and thanks too for repairing vandalism to my user page. --John 20:24, 18 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks and you're very welcome. Will (aka Wimt) 20:29, 18 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Congratulations. I still remember when you reverted vandalism on my userpage. NHRHS2010^Talk 20:49, 18 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hehe yeah that feels like so long ago but it really wasn't! Thanks :-) Will (aka Wimt) 20:51, 18 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Also, well done blocking User:69.225.51.220. Did you look at WP:AIV, or did you see the vandalism? NHRHS2010^Talk 20:53, 18 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I got that one from AIV actually - it was my first block from a report at AIV :-) Will (aka Wimt) 20:54, 18 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Well, I see you like the new tools very much, right? :-) Evilclown93_(talk) 20:54, 18 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Heh yeah still getting used to them at the moment so I'm not at full speed but they are very helpful! Will (aka Wimt) 20:57, 18 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Congratulations! —DerHexer (Talk) 20:55, 18 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you! Will (aka Wimt) 20:57, 18 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I am the one who reported that IP; someone using that IP copy pasted my user page and posted on someone else's userpage. NHRHS2010^Talk 20:55, 18 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah I saw you had reported it. Thanks! :-) Will (aka Wimt) 20:57, 18 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hey. *Cremepuff 222* 22:20, 18 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

:D Will (aka Wimt) 22:22, 18 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks

Thanks for reverting vandalism on my user page. Is it just me or is there a dedicated vandal at work today? Anyhow, your work is greatly appreciated. --TeaDrinker 20:59, 18 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You're very welcome. Happy to help. It does look rather like there is a dedicated userpage vandal out there today. Will (aka Wimt) 21:01, 18 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Indeed, thanks for the revert, and welcome to the ranks solider :P KOS | talk 21:12, 18 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hehe you're welcome! :-) Will (aka Wimt) 21:13, 18 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hehe

First block after 27 minutes, someone's eager! ;-) GDonato (talk) 21:23, 18 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Haha well no point wasting any time about it! :-p Will (aka Wimt) 21:25, 18 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Good call, though, all the best... GDonato (talk) 21:27, 18 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks :-) Will (aka Wimt) 21:29, 18 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please check WP:AIV once more. I have reported a range of IP there. NHRHS2010^Talk 22:06, 18 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah I'm afraid I'm probably going to have to defer that one to someone more experienced. That's quite a big rangeblock of an AT&T IP pool so I don't know how much collateral damage that could cause. Probably worth waiting for a more experienced rangeblocker! Will (aka Wimt) 22:15, 18 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

User:Mr.Z-man had blocked that range for 24 hours. NHRHS2010^Talk 22:17, 18 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

OK excellent :-) Will (aka Wimt) 22:18, 18 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Well done blocking User:203.144.14.99 as well. This user had attacked User:Alphachimp as well as vandalizing. NHRHS2010^Talk 00:40, 19 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. Yeah that IP seems to have somewhat of a history of vandalism. Will (aka Wimt) 00:41, 19 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I just made my 5000th edit today. NHRHS2010^Talk 02:13, 19 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Congratulations! You seem to be doing a great job! :-) Will (aka Wimt) 02:15, 19 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Admin! Congratulations

I'd just like to say congratulations on becoming a Wikipedia administrator. Well done! You deserve that honour :-) Lra drama 10:41, 19 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Congrats Wimt! I hope you're going to be a great Admin!Arnon Chaffin (Talk) 12:41, 19 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you very much! I hope I can live up to everyone's expectations :-) Will (aka Wimt) 11:11, 19 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Congratulations. Here are what pass for words of wisdom from the puppy:

Remember you will always protect the wrong version.
Remember you must always follow the rules, except for when you ignore them. You will always pick the wrong one to do. (See #5)
Remember to assume good faith and not bite. Remember that when you are applying these principles most diligently, you are probably dealing with a troll.
Use the block ability sparingly. Enjoy the insults you receive when you do block.
Remember when you make these errors, someone will be more than happy to point them out to you in dazzling clarity and descriptive terminology.
and finally, Remember to contact me if you ever need assistance, and I will do what I am able.

KillerChihuahua^?!?

DISCLAIMER: This humor does not reflect the official humor of Wikipedia, the Wikimedia Foundation, or Jimbo Wales. All rights released under GFDL.

Hehehe thank you very much :-). I'll be sure to follow your words of wisdom! Will (aka Wimt) 16:12, 19 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Glad you enjoyed the humor. I meant what I said, though - let me know if you ever need help! KillerChihuahua^?!? 21:18, 19 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks - yeah I'll be sure to ask if I ever get stuck. Will (aka Wimt) 21:23, 19 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

ill move it

to the discussing page thanks TheManWhoLaughs 19:00, 19 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Bible talk page

Thanks for taking care of that, sorry about the mess. I outlined what I tried to do here and what happened. So can anything be done about moving the archived version called Archive to September 2005 into an Archive 2 or it has to be left as it is. --BrokenSphere 22:00, 19 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hey - no problem. It looks like all the archives were simply created by copy and pasting so that would probably be the best way to fix that archive. Just copy the old revision into the now empty archive 2 page. Will (aka Wimt) 22:02, 19 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

question

I'm new to wikipedia (although I edited Martin Luther Kind Jr. web page once to include the number of people he spoke to when he gave his famous "I have a dream speech")

Anway, you deleted my article on Crair's Journey, saying that subject does not assert significance. What could I do to make it "assert significance"? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Noahlantz (talk • contribs).

Replied over there. Will (aka Wimt) 23:41, 21 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the answer! --Noahlantz

You're welcome :-) Will (aka Wimt) 00:05, 22 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Koosha

Heh - looks like we both SALTed it at the same time. As I blocked the guy now, shall I remove it from Wikipedia:Protected titles? - Alison ☺ 02:00, 22 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hehe yeah I removed mine when I saw you'd blocked the guy, but as far as your salting is concerned, it's up to you! There's probably no harm leaving it salted for a bit in case the guy comes back under another name. He seemed quite persistent. Regards. Will (aka Wimt) 02:04, 22 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Ok - will do. Seven times ... geez :) - Alison ☺ 02:12, 22 June 2007 (UTC) (thanks!)[reply]

Haha yeah, although for various different reasons it looks like. Anyways, I'm off to sleep now :-) Will (aka Wimt) 02:14, 22 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

'night! I'm off home now for dinner :) - Alison ☺ 02:18, 22 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Your Help with Mary Beth Harrell

Thank you for helping protect the Mary Beth Harrell article. I've been having all sorts of trouble with it. People really don't like her, I guess. Also, congrats on becoming an admin! I've seen you around and you always make wonderful edits. Thank you for your help, and see you around! DangerousNerd talk 17:07, 22 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you very much! Yeah I'm not quite sure why that article is taking such a hit but I'll keep an eye on it. Regards. Will (aka Wimt) 17:09, 22 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

My user page

Thank you a whole lot. I can honestly say I have no idea what all that vandalism was about. Dodger Of Zion refers to something that isn't even in the realm of what the said vandals were claiming. Your hard work is far from unappreciated, so...

		The RickK Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
		I give you the anti-vandalism barn star for never surrendering to the idiots and small-minded who get their jollies from belittling others. DodgerOfZion 03:33, 23 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks again! --DodgerOfZion 03:33, 23 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you!

Thanks Wimt for reverting both of my user pages.Arnon Chaffin (Talk) 14:22, 23 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You're welcome Arnon :-) Happy to help. Will (aka Wimt) 14:31, 23 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks

Thanks for the vandalism revert. Btw, I have sprotected your talk page (and mine too) for one hour. The vandal is in a MASSIVE dyn ip pool. Hopefully that would get him disintersted. --soum ^talk 14:55, 23 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hey - you're welcome. Yeah good idea on the semi protection. Thanks. Will (aka Wimt) 14:57, 23 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

talk page trolling

The user who you blocked 70.251.135.182 is trolling on their talk page after you blocked them. Can you protect it? Francisco Tevez 15:20, 23 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Looks like Yamamoto Ichiro beat me to it :-) Will (aka Wimt) 15:22, 23 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

protected by another admin. Francisco Tevez 15:23, 23 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for removing racist vandalism to my userpage. I am very offended by what the Ip did, it looks like the one mentioned up above in the dicussion. Who has rolled a new Ip to harass editors. Francisco Tevez 17:39, 23 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah you're welcome for the revert. Unfortunately it does seem to be a person with access to a large number of IPs who is vandalising a number of userpages. I've watchlisted your userpage so hopefully if he returns I should catch it if I'm around. Regards. Will (aka Wimt) 17:48, 23 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks!

Thanks for reverting the vandalism on my talk page! Guess thats what I get for reverting vandalism myself. Rockerbaby 16:37, 23 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I just came here to say the same thing. Thanks. --P4k 00:53, 24 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

help with 74.245.223.221

I noticed you blocked 74.245.223.221 on june 22. He/she started vandalizing articles again upon returning. I would appreciate it if you took a quick look. PStrait 07:58, 24 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hey - yeah it looks like he did. As he hasn't made any edits for 12 hours though, I won't block at the moment but I'll keep an eye out in case he returns. Regards. Will (aka Wimt) 08:18, 24 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry

I'd already blocked User:WV123 when you gave him the warning, so I just replaced the warning with the block notice. Sorry about that, but I feel like it's a pretty clear-cut example of a vandalism-only account. EVula // talk // ☯ // 20:20, 24 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hehe don't apologise - I was being way too nice. Clear vandal only account. Good work. Regards. Will (aka Wimt) 20:20, 24 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

My editing

What if I stoppped? Happysummer 14:26, 25 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

70.101.75.32

I thought you blocked User:70.101.75.32 he's stil editing. Oyster Guitarst 23:01, 25 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah I have blocked him. Blocked users are still able to edit their own talk pages though, which explains why he is still editing. If he continues to abuse it though, I'll semiprotect the talk page to prevent him doing so. Regards. Will (aka Wimt) 23:08, 25 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Timing

Hi there; tell me, if you will, how did you get to User:Tom773 so fast? He came up on WP:AIV, I looked at his edits, went to block him and you'd done it! AndI was right there, watching the page!!--Anthony.bradbury^"talk" 23:04, 25 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hehe I have the page watchlisted on VandalFighter so it lets me know as soon as someone posts to the page. Sorry about beating you! Regards. Will (aka Wimt) 23:07, 25 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks

Thank you for reverting vandalism to my userpage, Will. Best regards, Hús ö nd 23:55, 25 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You're very welcome. Always more than happy to help. Regards. Will (aka Wimt) 23:58, 25 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Cheers

No problem, anytime =). Peace. Spartan-James 00:04, 26 June 2007 (UTC) [reply]

Cheers

Thanks for fixing my (admitedly lame) userpage, and blocking 67.71.143.194 | talk. Guy just wouldn't quit. Ravanacker | Talk 00:54, 26 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

About Dramatic Chipmunk

Contest the non-notability label. Despite enlarging article and showing references, page still flagged. Fail to understand criteria. Evil0verl0rd 19:13, 26 June 2007 (UTC) [reply]

Re: About Dramatic Chipmunk

Hmmm. I get your point. Despite not entirely agreeing, will refrain for now.

Thanks. Will (aka Wimt) 08:02, 27 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion

No problem. Happy editing! Prodego ^talk 00:34, 28 June 2007 (UTC) [reply]

thanks

Thanks for reverting vandalism on my page!--♫Twinkler4♫ ^{(Talk to me!)} 22:28, 29 June 2007 (UTC) [reply]

Thanks for reverting

Thank you for reverting vandalism on my userpage! ... discospinster _talk 00:02, 30 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

... and protecting it. Seems we have a proxy-jumper on our hands. ... discospinster _talk 00:41, 30 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks

Thanks for reverting the vandalism on my user page. Given what I was warning him for (vandalising the user page of the last person to warn him), I was expecting it, but you got it before I even noticd. Again, thanks! Angus Lepper^{(T, C, D)} 00:24, 30 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

User:Rockermang

Why did you revert my edits to this user's profile? It is well documented that the edits I made are factual, and the user has not had the option to decide if he wants it on his profile or not. 71.197.197.100 02:17, 30 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You know full well your edits were personal attacks and if you do it again you will be blocked. Will (aka Wimt) 02:22, 30 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I think we should let Rockermang decide!71.197.197.100 02:23, 30 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

No, not at all. If he wanted to add something to his userpage, he can do so when he returns. It is not up to you to do so. And your edits are simply personal attacks as I say. Now go and do something useful. You are very much on your last warning here. Will (aka Wimt) 02:25, 30 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Well I think we should ask him about it. 71.197.197.100 02:32, 30 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Clearly with this edit you have shown that you are also User:Rockermang, a user with a history of nothing more than vandalism. I'm not sure what you are hoping to achieve here, but please stop it. I am off to sleep now anyway. Will (aka Wimt) 02:35, 30 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry Chief, I'm not rockermang. I'm a completely different vandal. 71.197.197.100 02:39, 30 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

IP has been blocked for 31 hours for vandalism FYI. Momusufan 03:49, 30 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Why?

Why did you revert the so called "vandalism" on my page? It looks pretty the way it was! - THANKS BB <333 ROCKERMANG!!

Non admin response: The content on your page is not appropriate, i'll leave it for the admins to decide. Momusufan 03:42, 30 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Absolutely right. Thanks for the responses here Momusufan! Will (aka Wimt) 10:00, 30 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

RfA thanks

Hi Wimt/Archive. Thank you for your support and kind words in my RfA, which passed with 95 support, 1 oppose, and 1 neutral !votes. It means a lot to me to have your individual support and the collective support of so many others. I truly will strive to carry myself at a level representing the trust bestowed in me as I use the mop to address the never-ending drips of discontent in need of caretaker assistance.

Jreferee ^(Talk) 07:56, 30 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

What is Your opinion about Red Army crimes?

What is Your opinion about Red Army crimes category and articles about military (comunistic or not) massacres? Do You suppose I suffered users attack yesterday or not? Why so speed deletion of my article on computer crime? It was marked to speedy delete for 3 minutes and urgrently it was deleted!

Ttturbo 20:05, 30 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I'm afraid I know very little about that subject. As far as speedying your article is concerned, I did this because it made little sense and was in article space. If you want to put across your point, doing so by creating inappropriate articles really won't help your case. As for why I noticed it and deleted it so quickly, that's because you had used the {{helpme}} template in article space, which immediately arouses suspicions. Regards. Will (aka Wimt) 20:30, 30 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

And I nominated it for the same reason. It's impossible to tell whether a subject is notable when an article is so incoherent. Sorry. EliminatorJR ^Talk 23:36, 30 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Why do you suppose wiki user:talk page hacked becouse of describing Red army crimes hiders to be NONSENSE?Ttturbo 09:28, 1 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. This means that such crimes must be presented and discussed becouse of Soviet propoganda described only one side of it's army history!I think it was really suspicious, asking for help in such a way after attack in a style of Russian secret services! They made tremendous hacking attacks against Estonians recently and this is their method! I suppose they and Kim Philbys pernetrated wikipedia too. I would like You could find something positive from my deleted article and publish something in usefull way.

Ttturbo 20:38, 30 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Well I'm afraid I'm probably not going to be much help, because I'm rather confused by the whole situation. Sorry about that. Probably best for me to defer it to someone more knowledgeable in such areas. Regards. Will (aka Wimt) 20:50, 30 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Help

For the second period I'm under sharp disruptive user:Miranda's attack in my users:talk and even help desk pages. She's telling not truth. Ttturbo 10:17, 2 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I Am Sorry

I am sorry for what I did. I have a reason for why I.. (I shouldn't really say "I") did it but it sounds unbelievable so I will just take the blame. "I" promise not to vandilise any important articles.. or any articles for that matter.. anymore. --24.95.66.88 03:18, 1 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Apology accepted! Just try not to let whatever occurred happen again. Regards. Will (aka Wimt) 09:37, 1 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

User:Mateia

Listen User:mateia is my page but i lost my password and no i am mad OK I AM NOW MORE RELAXED —Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.18.88.170 (talk • contribs)

And we are suposed to believe you because... Momusufan 16:29, 1 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

if you have a messenger please contact me mateiand2@yahoo.com I just a 12 years old kid —Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.18.88.170 (talk • contribs)

Whether or not that's true, I don't have any great urge to discuss such matters with you on IM. If you want to put your point across you can do so here. However, the fact is simple - if that is your account, you need to log in to make such changes to the userpage. If you can't for some reason I suggest you create a new account. Will (aka Wimt) 16:34, 1 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Your IP address traces back to Romania and this range has been vandalising userpages as well. Momusufan 16:35, 1 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Well i don't remember my password i tried macosx, macosxleo haikuos —Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.18.88.170 (talk • contribs)

As I said, assuming good faith that you are telling the truth, the only option in that instance]] is to create a new account, supposing you can't use the feature to email the password to yourself. Making controversial edits the the userpage is just going to continue getting you blocked. Will (aka Wimt) 16:39, 1 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This IP range has been vandalising userpages and IP's in your range have been blocked at WP:AIV Momusufan 16:40, 1 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, I find it hard to believe you have lost the password to another account too. Will (aka Wimt) 16:42, 1 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

He also appears as 86.122.*.*, doing the same thing. They were blocked at AIV too. So yes I find your "lost password" claim hard to believe. Momusufan 16:46, 1 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Update: 81.18.88.170 has been blocked 24 hours at AIV by Riana. Momusufan 16:49, 1 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Good stuff. Looks like he's on quite a big dynamic range though unfortunately. Will (aka Wimt) 16:50, 1 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

If you dont believe me thats is fine whit and it is true I vandalized some of those pages just because I got angry at those who were didnt believe me Are you happy now plus everyone I vandalized had reverted my changes on my account and as a extra plus here is my blog alpha-fsq.blogspot.com i HAVE MADE A NEW ACCOUNT User:Mateia2 although the history repeats itself that is what happened whit my email too guy it makes you laugh of my stupidity

Barnstar!

		The Original Barnstar
		For your quick blocking of a vandal! MAJ5 ^(talk) _(contribs) 20:01, 1 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, do you know how to add my archives to my archive box on my talk page? I need to add User Talk: MAJ5/June2007 and User Talk: MAJ5/July2007. Thanks. MAJ5 ^(talk) _(contribs) 20:13, 1 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

That was perfect. Thanks! Also, in the future I wish to possibly start a RFA. What should I do to be ready for one IE: more mfd votes ect I know I should be more than a year or about but what else? MAJ5 ^(talk) _(contribs) 20:21, 1 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

WOW!

I don't know if this means anything to you but lookie here. MAJ5 ^(talk) _(contribs) 20:34, 1 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Well done. :-) Keep up the great work! Will (aka Wimt) 20:41, 1 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

ER

Could you comment at my editor review please? Thanks and Cheers! MAJ5 ^(talk) _(contribs) 23:43, 1 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah sure. I'm heading to sleep soon so I won't have time to do it tonight, but I'll do it tomorrow. :-) Will (aka Wimt) 23:46, 1 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

User:Mateia2

Wimt I made myself a new user page and I have a question is the possibility to restrict everyone from modifying it because when someone modifies my page I GO NUTS REALLY

Thanks for your time anyway —Preceding unsigned comment added by Mateia2 (talk • contribs)

Replied over this way. Will (aka Wimt) 13:27, 2 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

My recent RfB

Thank you so much for your participation in my recent RfB. Though it closed with 72% support (below the required 90%), I'm still quite pleased at the outpouring of support shown by a fair percentage of the community.

I'm currently tabulating and calculating all opposing and neutral arguments to help me better address the community's concerns about my abilities as a bureaucrat. If you'd like, you can follow my progress (and/or provide additional suggestions) at User:EVula/admin/RfB notes. Thanks again! EVula // talk // ☯ // 03:56, 3 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks

Thanks for sorting out that message posting at the redirect to my user talk page under my new name — . Qst 19:43, 3 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

No problemo. Anytime! :-) Will (aka Wimt) 19:44, 3 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks

As the heading states, thanks for the talk page revision. Dust Filter 23:20, 3 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Recent Vandalism

I think you may have noticed the multiple vandalisms by different IPs to multiple admin's user pages and talk pages where he/she redirects the pages to Emo (slang). Is there anything we can do to stop it, or just clean it up and let it go? ---Signed By KoЯnfan71 (User Page—My Talk) 23:53, 3 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Sounds good. I'll help if/when possible. ---Signed By KoЯnfan71 (User Page—My Talk) 23:58, 3 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Just thought I'd mention that most of these recent IPs look like open proxies. -- zzuuzz ^(talk) 00:11, 4 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Oh ok that makes sense. Feel free to extend any of my blocks if they are then. :-) Regards. Will (aka Wimt) 00:13, 4 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah that guys gone nuts, I've protected quite a few user pages this morning, including this one. Happy editing. :) KOS | talk 08:33, 4 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Seems to have stopped for now. Block indef as proxies just in case. Cheers, ~ Riana ⁂ 08:42, 4 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks everyone for the reverting / blocking / protecting while I was asleep! Much appreciated. :-) Will (aka Wimt) 12:20, 4 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Jews Article

I actually have no interest in the subject what-so-ever. I seen it on the "Recent Changes" page, clicked on it, revert, Warn2'd the user, and went on from there. Seen it was reverted again, Warn3'd and well, you get the idea. I have no real interest in the article, I leave that up to someone else.

I was not vandalising, I actually hate vandalism, so I wouldn't do it myself and contrary to User:Perspicacite, I don't have a "anti-Semitic agenda". All I do is revert vandalism when I have done the work I can for the day. I give you all a hand with the vandalism "parade". No "agenda" and no vandalism from me. - NeutralHomer ^T:C 12:42, 4 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your comment. I appericate it. I think I will leave "Recent Changes" to you all. Just another department I get in trouble being in. Take Care and Happy 4th....NeutralHomer ^T:C 12:51, 4 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

sigh* Could you please speak to User:Perspicacite about comments like this and this. What I said, while losing my temper, on the September 11 "days of the year" page had NOTHING to do with my mistake today and asserting that the two events are connected and saying that I have a "anti-Semitic agenda" is a personal attack I would hope this user knows is against the rules. Please talk with him. - NeutralHomer ^T:C 13:00, 4 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah I've left a message on ANI. I'm keeping an eye on it. Will (aka Wimt) 13:01, 4 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks :S - NeutralHomer ^T:C 13:02, 4 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

WP:RFA/ACL 2

Thanks! :) Acalamari 23:04, 4 July 2007 (UTC) [reply]

Blocked user question

Hi Will, a user that you blocked indefinitely yesterday (User:Wikimaster987) has blanked his user page an hour ago. Is that okay (in other words: can blocked users still make edits on their user talk page or does it mean he was unblocked)? Malc82 13:59, 30 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hey - yeah that user is indef blocked. Blocked users are still able to edit their own talk pages (so that they can place unblock requests there). However, it is possible to protect the talk page from editing if they abuse it repeatedly. Will (aka Wimt) 14:01, 30 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Okay then, thanks. Malc82 14:05, 30 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I tried to report that user earlier for running a sockpuppet User:Wikimaster456 (report at Wikipedia:Suspected_sock_puppets/Wikimaster456). I guess the report sockpuppet popup didn't work right, but it probably needs to be looked into. In any case, he's been blanking his talk page and that of the other account. By the way, thanks for reverting that vandalism on my userpage earlier today. Life, Liberty, Property 22:14, 5 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hey - you're welcome for the revert. I've left a comment at that sockpuppetry case and on the new user's talk page. It's pretty clear that they are the same but, given their two article contributions so far with the new account have been positive, I am going to assume good faith that they might want to turn over a new leaf. I will however keep a very close eye on the account and have informed them that this will be their last chance. Regards. Will (aka Wimt) 22:38, 5 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Oh and also Magnus animum has protected the talk page of Wikimaster987 to prevent any more blanking. Will (aka Wimt) 22:43, 5 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Strange

Would you take a look at User talk:67.150.87.146? I think somebody copied a template, because Can't sleep, clown will eat me isn't active right now, and the edit shows the IP did it. Acroterion _(talk) 02:15, 5 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Never mind, just realized what time it is where you are. I'll ask a North American admin about this. Acroterion _(talk) 02:21, 5 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah sorry I'd just headed to sleep then. Regards. Will (aka Wimt) 09:52, 5 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

User:GPattle

Thanks for re-verting the vandalism on my page. Some stupid guys at school........

Anyway you might want to put this message in a fancy box because I can't do it myself.

Thanks again - GPattle

Also, thanks for doing the same for me! These aggrieved anons... much appreciated, . . dave souza, talk 16:35, 5 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You're most welcome. :-) Will (aka Wimt) 16:47, 5 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Oops!

Something went wrong. Obviously you aren't the vandal. Sorry for the mistake. —EncMstr 19:42, 5 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hehe no worries :-) Will (aka Wimt) 19:43, 5 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks

Thanks for deleting the vandalism on my user page. That's a real big help, since I'm currently on vacation, and not able to monitor it. The vandal needs to be blocked. Flap Jackson 22:44, 5 July 2007 (UTC) [reply]

Ridiculous conversation with a ridiculous user

Hello, I thought maybe you could help me a little. I reverted some vandalism on an article, which resulted in a most ridiculous argument with the vandal, and you can see that on my talkpage (click on the blue part of my signature). Now he's going to do something daft by the sound of things after I tried to make him see sense, and he refused to believe. I don't have much experience yet with these matters, is there anything you can suggest? Please look at the relevant discussion on my talkpage if you've time. Many, many thanks, Lra drama 09:36, 6 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Warned, and I'm keeping a very close eye on him. If he continues I'll block him since he appears to just be here to disrupt. Regards. Will (aka Wimt) 09:47, 6 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Since he vandalised your userpage after my warning, I've blocked him indefinitely. Hopefully that should put an end to all the nonsense! :-) Will (aka Wimt) 09:49, 6 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thankyou so much for your assistance. I think he created another account to vandalise my userpage after you blocked him. There were two more edits of the same nature. I've never had such a childish conversation in years! Thank you so much. Lra drama 10:01, 6 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Lradrama has smiled at you! Smiles promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by smiling at someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Happy editing!
Smile at others by adding {{subst:Smile}} to their talk page with a friendly message.

You're very welcome and thank you very much for the smile! Best regards. Will (aka Wimt) 10:05, 6 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

strange

My userpage has just become a target for a number of vandals. They've added someones phonenumber onto my userpage. I have reverted it, but its still in the history. Can you remove it? then protect my page? Francisco Tevez 11:04, 6 July 2007 (UTC) [reply]

Thanks

Thank you for blocking 88.108.62.145 HappiestCamper 11:49, 8 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

No problem! Good work on the reverts. :-) Regards. Will (aka Wimt) 11:50, 8 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

My (Kwsn's) RfA

Thank you for supporting my recent RfA. It unfortunately did not succeed. I still plan to continue to edit however. Hope to see you around. Kwsn^(Ni!) 15:12, 8 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Eddie's Retirement

Hello, Will. Thank you for your kind words. It really hurt to write that paragraph, but I believe my retirement is necessary. I may come back, but only after a few months. Again, thank you, and good-bye. Happy editing! Yours sincerely, E ddie 16:44, 8 July 2007 (UTC) [reply]

My RfB

Thank you, Will, for participating in my RfB, which ended unsuccessfully with a final tally of (80/22/3).
I shall continue to work on behalf of the community's interests and improve according to your suggestions.
Most sincere regards, Hús ö nd 23:40, 10 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Obrigado, Will, por participares no meu RfB, que terminou sem sucesso com um resultado final de (80/22/3).
Continuarei a trabalhar em prol dos interesses da comunidade e a melhorar segundo vossas sugestões. Calorosos cumprimentos, Hús ö nd 23:40, 10 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks • Obrigado • Gracias • Merci • Danke • Спасибо • Tack • Kiitos
Esker • Köszönöm • Takk • Grazie • Hvala • ありがとう • 謝謝 • 谢谢

Image:Roberto Clemente.jpg

Thanks for this. --Eddie 14:44, 11 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You're welcome. Will (aka Wimt) 14:47, 11 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You're welcome!

You're welcome on the revert, my man. I'm always here to help out someone who's been vandalized. :3 Dan 15:37, 11 July 2007 (UTC) [reply]

question about a shock image you recently deleted

When I look at the diffs of the talk pages that User:Goingalso posted this disturbing image to, I can still see the image even though it's deleted. Is there anyway to fix this without deleting the talk pages? Thanks Dina 14:29, 12 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hmm that's very strange. If it's that particular deleted image that's showing up, the only think I can think of is that some of the squid servers haven't caught up with the database yet and so are still displaying the image even though it has been deleted. If that is the case, I'd hope the image would stop displaying there shortly then. Unless there's something else causing it that I can't think of. Will (aka Wimt) 14:34, 12 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

user:67.71.22.136

Hi there; I have extended this user's block, which you applied for 24 hours, to 72 hours in the light of the edits he has made on his talk page. If you, in turn, think that I am too lenient please feel free to extend it further. --Anthony.bradbury^"talk" 20:48, 12 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

That looks fine to me. I've removed the nonsense from his talk page too and semi protected it for the length of the block to stop him making any more such edits. Regards. Will (aka Wimt) 20:53, 12 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Help with article about (Kirk Fraser)

Im sending you a request. I've look over the deletion of Kirk Fraser, The original article had the incorrect spelling of his last name. Check out the (http://www.answers.com/topic/kirk-frasier) the article is still wrong. We originally created a new page on Wikipedia with the correct spelling and paste the content from Wikipedia with the incorrect spelling of Frasier. It was shortly deleted, we once again created it again, and it was also deleted. We don't know what to do. It seems like once it's up it taken down again, when it was originally put up by some one else. We just wanted to change the spelling of the Last name and fix the content that was wrong. Can you please help me in guiding me to correct this issue. Thanks.

Hello there. The reason that the article is currently being deleted when it is recreated at the moment is that it fulfils the speedy deletion critera G4 in that it is an article that has been deleted per an articles for deletion discussion which occurred here. If you wish to create the article again you should progress via a deletion review, the instructions of which can be found on that page. Hope that helps. Will (aka Wimt) 21:47, 15 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome back!

Hope you enjoyed your holiday!!

Kindest Regards
Rlest 12:44, 21 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]