User talk:Wilstrup

Reply to Sumerian direction query

Hi, in response to your query, I cannot read cuneiform (at least not without consulting expertise help!) and I don't know the answer off-hand. I searched google-books for [Sumerian "left to right"] and also [Sumerian "right to left"], and found a number of sources saying both. (Try it!) One book for younger readers says that the scribes used left to right, top to bottom on side one of the tablet, then flipped the tablet over and wrote right to left, bottom to top. Others say that the direction of left to right stabilized around 2300 BC. Cheers, Til Eulenspiegel (talk) 23:30, 2 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Ah, thank you. In ED we actually do have samples, where the scribe apparently flipped the tablet both horizontally and vertically. Rotating this kind of tablets does look like a right-to-left script, but with the fist line at the bottom. The practice of rotating the tablet top-to-bottom is not attested after Early Dynastic II, as far as I know. But thanks for the clarification. Wilstrup (talk) 23:46, 2 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

English

Hi - thanks for your work patrolling new pages. Just a note - for pages that are purely in a foreign language we usually tag them with {{Notenglish}} rather than a A1,A3, or G1 tag. I suspect in this case these will be A7's (16 year old kids) but without translation it's hard to tell. 7 08:17, 10 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the tip.Wilstrup (talk) 08:22, 10 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Sure 7 08:26, 10 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

New Page Patrol survey

New page patrol – Survey Invitation

Hello Wilstrup! The WMF is currently developing new tools to make new page patrolling much easier. Whether you have patrolled many pages or only a few, we now need to know about your experience. The survey takes only 6 minutes, and the information you provide will not be shared with third parties other than to assist us in analyzing the results of the survey; the WMF will not use the information to identify you.

If this invitation also appears on other accounts you may have, please complete the survey once only.
If this has been sent to you in error and you have never patrolled new pages, please ignore it.

Please click HERE to take part.
Many thanks in advance for providing this essential feedback.

You are receiving this invitation because you have patrolled new pages. For more information, please see NPP Survey. Global message delivery 13:55, 26 October 2011 (UTC)

Nomination of Albert Francis Capone for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Albert Francis Capone is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Albert Francis Capone until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Giant Snowman 09:17, 1 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

New deal for page patrollers

Hi Wilstrup,

In order to better control the quality of new pages, keep out the spam, and welcome the genuine newbies, the current system we introduced in 2011 is being updated and improved. The documentation and tutorials have also been revised and given a facelift. Most importantly a new user group New Page Reviewer has been created.

Under the new rule, you may find that you are temporarily unable to mark new pages as reviewed. However, this is nothing to worry about - most current experienced patrollers are being accorded the the new right without the need to apply, and if you have significant previous experience of patrolling new pages, we strongly encourage you to apply for the new right as soon as possible - we need all the help we can get, and we are now providing a dynamic, supportive environment for your work.

Find out more about this exiting new user right now at New Page Reviewers and be sure to read the new tutorial before applying. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 04:29, 13 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:33, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]