User talk:Wilspaul

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Roman Catholic Brahmin

Please note that I fixed your nomination of Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Roman Catholic Brahmin. I personally have no opinion about this topic, but there were various technical problems with the nomination, which I believe are now fixed. Please see WP:AFDHOWTO in case you need to nominate anything else for deletion. --Metropolitan90 (talk) 16:48, 9 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please remember to assume good faith when dealing with other editors, which you did not do on Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Roman Catholic Brahmin. Thank you. Don't be incivil! --Orange Mike | Talk 14:10, 10 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

ANI Notice

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there currently is a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.--Sodabottle (talk) 13:43, 10 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits

Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You could also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 10:04, 11 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Warning

The rants you leave @ Talk:Roman Catholic Brahmin are unacceptable, and come close to attacks of an entire group; you are free to disagree, but please do not spew your views in ALLCAPS in such a hostile way. Choyoołʼįįhí:Seb az86556 ^{> haneʼ} 12:39, 11 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

February 2011

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Roman Catholic Brahmin, you may be blocked from editing. Boolyme ^Chat!! 14:17, 11 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Again:

You are displaying some serious "behavioral issues" which are contrary to the spirit of this whole endeavor; please stop attacking other people by means of style (ALLCAPS, which is perceived as yelling) or word choice. You have made your point quite clearly. Now step back and change your approach here. Choyoołʼįįhí:Seb az86556 ^{> haneʼ} 14:31, 11 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Block Notice

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for failing to adhere to the collegial editing requirements on Wikipedia. You have no authority nor right to "condemn" another editor, and your "way" is not the "consensus" way. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. (talk→ BWilkins ←track) 15:56, 11 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

ANI 2nd

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there currently is a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Choyoołʼįįhí:Seb az86556 ^{> haneʼ} 15:39, 11 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This is injustice. I have not made any wrong entries. I condemned only the wrong contents of the article "Roman Catholic Brahmin" - The title is offensive, as the word "Brahmin" entirely belongs to "Hindu" religion. But here only with a motto of conversion in agenda, people are trying to incorporate and inculturalize the religion of "Christianity" with "Hindu" terms. If this continues, legal actions abiding the juristriction of Indian Courts will be sought on Wikipedia. Kindly change the title to "Roman Catholic Converts" or any other relevant titles other than mentioning it as "Roman Catholic Brahmin"

March 2011

Your recent edits to User talk:Wilspaul could give Wikipedia contributors the impression that you may consider legal or other "off-wiki" action against them, or against Wikipedia itself. Please note that making such threats on Wikipedia is strictly prohibited under Wikipedia's policies on legal threats and civility. Users who make such threats may be blocked. If you have a dispute with the content of any page on Wikipedia, please follow the proper channels for dispute resolution. Please be sure to comment on content not contributors, and where possible make specific suggestions for changes supported by reliable independent sources and focusing especially on verifiable errors of fact. Thank you. Elizium23 (talk) 12:21, 4 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I would like to make a very clear note that, my aim is not to threaten Wikipedia. Wikipedia is very helpful in getting a lot of useful information about many things below the Sun. But my intention is to prevent some anti-social elements entering Wikipedia and polluting its contents. I am not well-versed with various "tags" and "claims" claims of Wikipedia. So i am filing my corrective attempts in the articles. About the said article "Roman Catholic Brahmin" a lot of false entries have been made. Eventhough it is being claimed to source from some written works, even i may show a lot of falsy written proofs for any claims that i make. I am also making it very clear that, the authors and editors of the said article of "Roman Catholic Brahmin" are against Hindu religion. With no due respect they have included the name of Hindu GOD Ganapathi in their article. Also they are trying to introduce the Hindu aspects into Christianity which is against righteousness. So Kindly take suitable actions on the authors of Roman Catholic Brahmin to curtail their offensive methods. I meant the blocking of my profile against editing is wrong.

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Roman Catholic Brahmin. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Choyoołʼįįhí:Seb az86556 ^{> haneʼ} 08:48, 7 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

That editing is not vandalism. Those sentences are Defaming Hinduism and Hindu GOD Ganapathi Wilspaul (talk) 08:54, 7 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Roman Catholic Brahmin, you may be blocked from editing. Choyoołʼįįhí:Seb az86556 ^{> haneʼ} 08:58, 7 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Only those sentences had WP:DEFAME contents to Hindu religion and Hindu GOD Ganapathi please donot redo the same in the article page. I am not vandalising Wikipedia.

This is your last warning; the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Roman Catholic Brahmin, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Choyoołʼįįhí:Seb az86556 ^{> haneʼ} 09:00, 7 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked again, for continued revert-warring and overall tendentious editing. Block duration is 48 hours. Fut.Perf. ☼ 09:12, 7 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]