User talk:Wilsoncleveland

Welcome! (We can't say that loudly enough!)

Here are a few links you might find helpful:

You can sign your name on talk pages and votes by typing ~~~~; our software automatically converts it to your username and the date.

If you have any questions or problems, no matter what they are, leave me a message on my talk page. Or, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on your user page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions.

We're so glad you're here! -- Merope ^Talk

Make the Right Hire

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! We welcome and appreciate your contributions, such as Make the Right Hire, but we regretfully cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from either web sites or printed material. This article appears to be a direct copy from http://houston.bizjournals.com/houston/stories/2006/09/04/focus3.html. As a copyright violation, Make the Right Hire appears to qualify for speedy deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. Make the Right Hire has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message. If the source is a credible one, please consider rewriting the content and citing the source.

If you believe that the article is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the GFDL, you can comment to that effect on Talk:Make the Right Hire. If the article has already been deleted, but you have a proper release, you can reenter the content at Make the Right Hire, after describing the release on the talk page. However, you may want to consider rewriting the content in your own words. Thank you, and please feel free to continue contributing to Wikipedia. -- Merope ^Talk 14:45, 20 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

How to Better Evaluate & Select the Right Employees

Please stop submitted copyrighted material for inclusion in Wikipedia. It will be deleted. I would also like to point out that Wikipedia is not a how-to guide, and even a rewrite of the information contained within this article would be subject to deletion. -- Merope ^Talk 15:29, 20 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked

I have blocked you from editing indefinitely for repeatedly posting advertisments. Wikipedia is not for advertising. Friday (talk) 21:36, 8 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for Image:41MCWatch06 courtney 54.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:41MCWatch06 courtney 54.jpg. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 22:04, 8 November 2006 (UTC)

Orphaned fair use image (Image:Spherion.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Spherion.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. This is an automated message from BJBot 22:23, 28 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please don't write about yourself

Hello, Wilsoncleveland. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places, or things you have written about in the article Wilson Cleveland, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a COI may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic, and it is important when editing Wikipedia articles that such connections be completely transparent. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. In particular, we ask that you please:

avoid editing or creating articles related to you and your family, friends, school, company, club, or organization, as well as any competing companies' projects or products;
instead, you are encouraged to propose changes on the Talk pages of affected article(s) (see the {{request edit}} template);
when discussing affected articles, disclose your COI (see WP:DISCLOSE);
avoid linking to the Wikipedia article or to the website of your organization in other articles (see WP:SPAM);
exercise great caution so that you do not violate Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation (see WP:PAID).

Please take a few moments to read and review Wikipedia's policies regarding conflicts of interest, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, sourcing and autobiographies. Thank you. Melcous (talk) 04:14, 31 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

July 2016

Hello! Thank you for your recent contributions to Wilson Cleveland. I did have one note for you. I am working on a maintenance project to clean up Category:Pages using infoboxes with thumbnail images. In the future, please do not use thumbnails when adding images to an infobox (see WP:INFOBOXIMAGE). What does this mean? Well in the infobox, when you specify the image you wish to use, instead of doing it like this: |image=[[File:SomeImage.jpg|thumb|Some image caption]], instead just supply the name of the image. So in this case you can simply do: |image=SomeImage.jpg. There will then be a separate parameter for the image caption such as |caption=Some image caption. Please note that this is a generic form message I am leaving on your page because you recetly added a thumbnail to an infobox. The specific parameters for the image and caption may be different for the infobox you are using! Please consult the Template page for the infobox being used to see better documentation. Thanks!! Zackmann08 (^{Talk to me}/_{What I been doing}) 18:23, 31 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: The Temp Life (April 18)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Heliosxeros was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage (not just mere mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject—see the guidelines on the notability of films, the golden rule and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners and Help:Introduction to referencing/1), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Cite third party sources: mainstream publications, newspapers, magazines or books. Stay away from homepages and official websites. Sources must provided extensive and in-depth coverage, a whole article that is. No user-generated content eg. Youtube

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:The Temp Life and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:The Temp Life, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

EROS ^message 11:09, 18 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Wilsoncleveland! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! EROS ^message 11:09, 18 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: The Temp Life has been accepted

The Temp Life, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Legacypac (talk) 20:16, 23 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your continued use of Wikipedia for promotion

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you use Wikipedia for soapboxing, promotion or advertising. --Ronz (talk) 16:37, 2 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Image without license

Unspecified source/license for File:Ricky Russert, Toronto International Film Festival, September 8, 2017.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Ricky Russert, Toronto International Film Festival, September 8, 2017.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time after the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{self|CC-by-sa-3.0|GFDL}} (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: Once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. --MifterBot ^{(Talk • Contribs • Owner)} 01:00, 13 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Ricky Russert, Toronto International Film Festival, September 8, 2017.jpg

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on File:Ricky Russert, Toronto International Film Festival, September 8, 2017.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from https://www.imdb.com/name/nm2216602/mediaviewer/rm2170429696. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. reddogsix (talk) 01:23, 13 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

"Minor" edits

Thank you for your contributions. Please mark your edits as "minor" only if they are minor edits. In accordance with Help:Minor edit, a minor edit is one that the editor believes requires no review and could never be the subject of a dispute. Minor edits consist of things such as typographical corrections, formatting changes or rearrangement of text without modification of content. Additionally, the reversion of clear-cut vandalism and test edits may be labeled "minor". Thank you. Melcous (talk) 21:57, 18 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Conflict of interest editing

Please use the articles for creation process and the Request edit template instead of directly editing articles you have a clear conflict of interest with. Melcous (talk) 06:30, 20 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Melcous: Thank you, Melcous. I really do appreciate your guidance and your patience. Did you place the maintenance template on list of The Temp Life episodes?

Yes I did, partly because of the WP:COI issue, but also because it is largely sourced to IMDB which is not a reliable source (see WP:UGC). It would have been much better for you to create this as a draft and get feedback first. Thanks Melcous (talk) 22:31, 20 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Melcous: I understand.

AfC notification: Draft:Kept Man (2014 film) has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Kept Man (2014 film). Thanks! Siddiqsazzad001 <Talk/> 16:47, 27 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Siddiqsazzad001: Thanks! USA Today ran a piece about the film in the 10/31/14 print edition only. I have a screen shot of the print article but no url because it didn't appear online. How do I cite the print version? Wilsoncleveland (talk) 18:32, 27 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Wilsoncleveland: Screenshot is not a reliable source. We need verify reliable website. Thank you, Siddiqsazzad001 <Talk/> 18:48, 27 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Siddiqsazzad001: Just added three more reliable sources including USA Today and TV Guide

Conflict of interest editing (again)

Please review the conflict of interest guidelines again and note that you are kindly requested not to directly edit articles about yourself or your work. You should instead use the Template:Request edit on the talk page. Melcous (talk) 20:51, 13 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Kept Man (2014 film) has been accepted

Kept Man (2014 film), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

TYelliot | Talk | Contribs 19:35, 14 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@TYelliot: Thank you!! Wilsoncleveland (talk) 19:51, 14 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Conflict of interest - yet again

You should not be creating articles about subjects with which you have a clear conflict of interest directly into the main space of the encyclopedia, but using the articles for creation process so that they can be reviewed by neutral editors first. Please stop. Continue to edit so many articles with which you are conflicted so often may lead to you being banned from editing them at all. Melcous (talk) 05:47, 27 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Wilsoncleveland. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]