User talk:Willy & the Poor Boys
|
Willy & the Poor Boys (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
Not sure what this means....Scibaby? How do I edit again? Thanks Willy & the Poor Boys (talk) 20:26, 11 July 2009 (UTC)
Decline reason:
This block is based on checkuser evidence and your edits do appear similar to those done by Scibaby's sockpuppets - this appeal included. Hersfold (t/a/c) 03:24, 14 July 2009 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
- Well, you weren't given the courtesy of a block message. On the odd chance that you are not Scibaby, I'll tell you that you have been blocked by Raul654, one of our heavyweights, who apparently believes that you are a banned editor trying to start up a new account. I'll see what I can find out. Be patient. I will do one thing: I will add the extra close curly brace at the end that you need to make the unblock template work and attract a neutral admin for review. No reason was given with the block, but maybe Raul654 knows something the rest of us don't.
- You do not have email enabled, or I would have emailed you. You may email me through the Wikipedia system, and then we can communicate directly. If you do, I may be more motivated to help. Scibaby, in my opinion, got a raw deal, excessive response, applied with bias, but has made up for it. Sock puppetry is not the way to challenge injustice on Wikipedia. --Abd (talk) 03:14, 14 July 2009 (UTC)