User talk:Willthehelpfuleditor

Welcome!

Your submission at Articles for creation: List of Engineer Regiments of the Union Army has been accepted

List of Engineer Regiments of the Union Army, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as List-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Rusalkii (talk) 17:42, 24 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you very much!! Willthehelpfuleditor (talk 17:55, 24 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi I've written an article on Ghana debating, can you please help review and approve the artcile for me? Desmondd23 (talk) 18:43, 13 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:50, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Do you have experience in competitive debate?

Hi. I see you are one of the few users still flagged as active in Wikipedia's debate project. Do you happen to have experience in competitive (particularly British parliamentary) debate? Would like some advice if so. Thanks. Nintendo2000 (talk) 04:25, 7 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hey there! I do happen to have experience in competitive debate, although, with regards to your question, my experience is primarily in PF and Policy debate. While I did help run NCFL nationals last year and have had some experience with BPD, so while I am probably not the best person to ask per se (I am happy to help where I can). Willthehelpfuleditor (talk 17:17, 11 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Wikiproject Military history coordinator election nominations open

Nominations for the upcoming project coordinator election have opened. A team of up to ten coordinators will be elected for the next coordination year. The project coordinators are the designated points of contact for issues concerning the project, and are responsible for maintaining our internal structure and processes. They do not, however, have any authority over article content or editor conduct, or any other special powers. More information on being a coordinator is available here. If you are interested in running, please sign up here by 23:59 UTC on 14 September! Voting will commence on 15 September. If you have any questions, you can contact any member of the current coord team. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:05, 2 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:55, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Voting for the WikiProject Military History newcomer of the year and military historian of the year awards for 2023 is now open!

Voting is now open for the WikiProject Military History newcomer of the year and military historian of the year awards for 2023! The the top editors will be awarded the coveted Gold Wiki . Cast your votes vote here and here respectively. Voting closes at 23:59 on 30 December 2023. On behalf of the coordinators, wishing you the very best for the festive season and the new year. Hawkeye7 (talk · contribs) via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 23:56, 22 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Voting for WikiProject Military history coordinators is now open!

Voting for WikiProject Military history coordinators is now open! A team of up to ten coordinators will be elected for the next coordination year. Register your vote here by 23:59 UTC on 29 September! MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:35, 18 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your user page

I edited your user page to fix lint errors, and while I was doing that, I unwrapped the markup for the infobox – which is how infoboxes are usually marked up, because it makes them easier to read and easier to edit. You reverted my edit – which is your right – with the edit summary "Automated edit but breaks my user page settup". If you think my edit was automated, I assure you it was not. When you say "breaks my user page settup", if you meant, "Stylistically, I think it looks better if the infobox markup is all wrapped up," well, you're entitled to your belief, but honestly, I find that quite strange, and the day may come where you want to change something, and it's much easier to do that if the markup is unwrapped. If you meant, "Well, you changed the appearance", yes, I see that, so now I am going to do my edit again in a way that both fixes the lint errors and also preserves the appearance as you had it. I hope you will find this satisfactory. Cheers! —Anomalocaris (talk) 21:22, 18 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

My apologies, I had earlier had a bot come through and do it a month prior and assumed this was a similar case. Additionally, this looks absolutely wonderful and I thank you for the extra time you put in because this is great. Thanks again for the updates and my best. Willthehelpfuleditor (talk 21:00, 23 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]