User talk:WilliamsFord

January 2021

This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sockpuppet that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that using multiple accounts is allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sockpuppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. 331dot (talk) 11:05, 6 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

WilliamsFord (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

What is the point in blocking me, i asked that my friends account was blocked what is the way to over and how to resolve that issue that was i asked blocking me says that i dont have freedom to mention my blocked friends name in wikipedia and i dont have freedom to contribute in wikipedia WilliamsFord (talk) 11:10, 6 January 2021 (UTC)

Decline reason:

This unblock request is incoherent. Yamla (talk) 11:18, 6 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Even if I believe you that you are a friend of the other user, this is still meatpuppetry. 331dot (talk) 11:27, 6 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This is not a perfect point why a friend of a blocked person cannot make a argument or cannot ask the solution to a problem he faces, my friend is also an human being and i am also an human being whether we don't have rights to open account in wikipedia 331dot see i did not make any promotion, i did not make a single similar edit that what is my friend [AravindanLakshmikanthan] has done before, and i created this account to learn about wikipedia. I asked that what is the solution to overcome the problem he facing how to unblock the sock puppet how can he make contribution again. See you guys are blocking that makes a feel like this Wikipedia is made to be edited by US, UK person no Indians are allowed to make changes, then what is the point on having pages of indians in wikipedia? In india it is believed that Wikipedia gives perfect and some useful information. Here what the vandalizers do is, making negative data for indian pages and making negative impact of an article but guys like you keeping silence and blocking persons like us who came to learn about wikipedia.

We don't know who is sitting at the computer or holding the phone making edits. We only know that your first edit was to come here and ask about a "friend" being unblocked. As that is an unusual thing for a new user to do, it is usually an indication of the use of multiple accounts, especially when the friend in question is themselves blocked for using multiple accounts. Even if you are a different person, we must treat you as if you are the same person, please read about meatpuppetry.

Wikipedia does not give "perfect" information and is not for merely providing information. In fact, Wikipedia is not a reliable source. What Wikipedia does is summarize what independent reliable sources state; it is up to readers to evaluate those sources and judge them for themselves as to their accuracy, bias, and other things. This has nothing to do with any alleged anti-Indian bias. We don't know the race or nationality of the person at the other end of the computer. If your "friend" wants to be unblocked, they must follow the process they likely have already been informed about. They cannot (and should not) recruit others to advocate for them. 331dot (talk) 11:55, 6 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

331dot Without knowing who uses the account, who sits in front of computer and how could you come to a point of conclusion and block us? By deciding the first edit was asking doubt to unblock my friend hence you blocked me that i was him, then there is not point that you are need to be continued as Administrator in Wikipedia, can you point out one line that Wikipedia blocking policy guidelines says, that a friend of a blocked person came to argue about his friend blocked as a 1st edit, has to be blocked and need to add him as sock puppet of his friend!!!!!!!!!!!!!!, Actually my friend is tired of arguing now really he fed-up completely and so i am asking this, what a single hearted guys and dumb brainy person as being as administrators in Wikipedia... Guys like you are saying that we are anti vandalism squad bla bla bla... but without knowing these blindly blocking and saying that you guys are anti vandalism squad bla bla bla... ---WilliamsFord (talk) 12:18, 6 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your ability to edit this talk page has been revoked as an administrator has identified your talk page edits as inappropriate and/or disruptive.

(block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should read the guide to appealing blocks, then contact administrators by submitting a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System.
Please note that there could be appeals to the unblock ticket request system that have been declined leading to the post of this notice.

331dot (talk) 12:21, 6 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I already did point that out, WP:MEAT. I've now removed your talk page access due to the personal attack and repetitive nature of your posts. I've said how your "friend" can proceed. 331dot (talk) 12:22, 6 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]