User talk:Williamevoss
please use the appropriate deletion process. [[User:Ixfd64|="
Speedy deletion nomination of Thrasos
[edit]I changed it to a PROD, so you can continue working on improving it during the 7-day grace period. Reaper Eternal (talk) 15:23, 29 December 2010 (UTC)
Inappropriate comments on article page
[edit]Please refrain from posting inappropriate comments on article pages like "so dont tick me off about it" on the Thrasos article. This can be construed as vandalism and can result in having your editing privileges blocked.-jsfouche ☽☾Talk 17:29, 29 December 2010 (UTC)
The article Thrasos has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
- Appears to be a notable subject but the article is very short, unsourced, and doesn't actually have enough context to identify the subject. It has previously been deleted twice after having been PRODed for similar reasons.
While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. bonadea contributions talk 18:26, 28 February 2011 (UTC)
March 2011
[edit]Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Thrasos. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. The reverted edit can be found here. Thank you. The Master of Mayhem 16:27, 19 March 2011 (UTC)
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at User talk:Reaper Eternal, you may be blocked from editing. The reverted edit can be found here. Thank you. The Master of Mayhem 16:33, 19 March 2011 (UTC)
This is your last warning; the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at User talk:Jsfouche, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. The reverted edit can be found here. Thank you. The Master of Mayhem 16:34, 19 March 2011 (UTC)
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. -- Ed (Edgar181) 17:30, 19 March 2011 (UTC){{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. -- Ed (Edgar181) 21:09, 23 March 2011 (UTC)April 2011
[edit]Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed content from User:Jsfouche with this edit. When removing content, please specify a reason in the edit summary and discuss edits that are likely to be controversial on the article's talk page. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the content has been restored, as you can see from the page history. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Wikipedian2 (talk) 21:55, 8 April 2011 (UTC)
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at User talk:Wikipedian2 with this edit. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. SeaphotoTalk 21:57, 8 April 2011 (UTC)
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at User:Seaphoto with this edit, you may be blocked from editing. SeaphotoTalk 21:59, 8 April 2011 (UTC)
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Jac16888Talk 22:03, 8 April 2011 (UTC)