Jump to content

User talk:Williambrighenti

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome!

Hello, Williambrighenti, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome!

You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles. See the Article Wizard.

Thank you.

A tag has been placed on Inventory Price Index Computation (IPIC) Method, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be blatant advertising that only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the general criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item 11, as well as the guidelines on spam.

If you can indicate why the subject of this article is not blatant advertising, you may contest the tagging. To do this, please add {{hangon}} on the top of Inventory Price Index Computation (IPIC) Method and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would help make it encyclopedic, as well as adding any citations from independent reliable sources to ensure that the article will be verifiable. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. -- Александр Дмитрий (Alexandr Dmitri) (talk) 03:46, 13 September 2009 (UTC) [reply]

Hello, Williambrighenti. You have new messages at AlexandrDmitri's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
yes, you wrote, it , yes, its not copyvio, but it seems entirely devoted to promoting your services. Unless you can find references providing substantial coverage from 3rd party independent published reliable sources, print or online, but not blogs or press releases, or material derived from press releases, and write in such a way as not to look like an advertisement, it has no place on Wikipedia, & I've deleted it. Please see our FAQ about businesses, other organisations, and articles like this. DGG ( talk ) 05:28, 13 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hello. Concerning your contribution, Ordinary and Necessary Expenses, please note that Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images obtained from other web sites or printed material, without the permission of the author(s). This article or image appears to be a direct copy from http://www.cpa-connecticut.com/ordinary-and-necessary.html. As a copyright violation, Ordinary and Necessary Expenses appears to qualify for deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. Ordinary and Necessary Expenses has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message.

If you believe that the article or image is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share-Alike License (CC-BY-SA) then you should do one of the following:

However, for textual content, you may simply consider rewriting the content in your own words. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with our copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright concerns very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Thank you. Hairhorn (talk) 07:14, 13 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

  • I note that you are cpa-connecticut.com. Even if you do not link to your, website, any article from you will be viewed with suspicion as veiled spam. But in any case, the two articles you have submitted were likely to be rejected as being how-to guides and of interest in only one country. You said in September "I will not visit Wikipedia again". That was a good idea. Why did you change your mind? But if you stay, I suggest you work on improving existing articles about taxation. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 09:15, 13 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]