Jump to content

User talk:Williamaiman

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Hi! welcome to Wikipedia!

Hope you enjoy contributing to Wikipedia. Be bold in editing pages. Here are some links that you might find useful:

I hope you stick around and keep contributing to Wikipedia. Drop us a note at Wikipedia:New user log.

-- utcursch | talk 16:11, 26 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Your page, 2lazy2blog may meet Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion. The given reason is: it is an article about a person, group of people, band or club that does not assert the importance or significance of the subject. (CSD A7)

If you disagree with its speedy deletion, please explain why on its talk page or at Wikipedia:Speedy deletions. If this page obviously does not meet the criteria for speedy deletion, or you intend to fix it, please remove this notice, but do not remove this notice from pages that you have created yourself.

If you intend to explain why you disagree with the speedy deletion, you may find it useful to insert the text "hangon" with two brace brackets into this article prior to writing your explanation. This will alert administrators to your intention, and may permit you the time to write your explanation.

HawkerTyphoon 16:30, 26 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Wikipedia is not an indiscriminate collection of information. Literally million and millions of articles could be created for every single subject in the world. However having so many articles (such as an article for every single song by every single artist) would make it very hard to keep the article up to any from of quality. When an articles gets too big (for example The Beatles) then (and only then) sub-articles are created to complement the article (History of The Beatles, When I'm Sixty-Four). Creating an article History of Gnuplot when Gnuplot is so small doesn't make any sense. In this case the information about the song was so small it does not warrant it's own articles. When articles about songs have been raised for deletion it has been the consensus of wikipedians that songs are generally not notable in themselves and should be included under the album or artist as appropriate (see Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Precedents#Music and Wikipedia:Notability (songs)). You can read Wikipedia:Notability (music) for information relating to what musical topics warrant their own articles and Wikipedia:Notability for information about Wikipedia notability rules in general. If you have any questions or if there is anything I can do to help you don't hesitate to contact me on my talk page. Jon513 19:03, 12 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

George W. Bush

[edit]

Please do not add nonsense to Wikipedia, as you did to George W. Bush. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. ¤~Persian Poet Gal (talk) 00:41, 13 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I would advise you to stop. This is your final warning; further incidents of vandalism will result in removal of your editing privileges. Johnleemk | Talk 19:35, 14 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
It has become apparent that your account is only being used for vandalism, so it has been blocked indefinitely.

--Sam Blanning(talk) 19:58, 14 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Williamaiman (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

shared account

Decline reason:

Shared accounts are not allowed, make an account for each person. -- HighInBC (Need help? Ask me) 22:29, 17 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

hi.i have msn messanger to do you want to talk to me on their -write back and i will tell you my username for msn- please reply---Masterlauryn 21:17, 24 December 2006 (UTC)masterlauryn[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (File:LMS picture.jpg)

[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:LMS picture.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:05, 15 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The file File:Baked alaska.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

orphaned file, no foreseeable use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Jon Kolbert (talk) 00:33, 14 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]