User talk:William M. Connolley/William M. Connolley 2
Appearance
Weird stuff. Errrm, what happened, why, and what should happen now? William M. Connolley (talk) 18:04, 24 April 2008 (UTC)
- Well, you've been blocking editors with whom you have an edit dispute. What you should do is stop doing that. ~ UBeR (talk) 18:09, 24 April 2008 (UTC)
- I'll assume that was a joke. In case you've actually misunderstood, the question is, what should happen to this RFC William M. Connolley (talk) 18:23, 24 April 2008 (UTC)
- Yes, I understood, but I thought you should know anyway. ~ UBeR (talk) 18:35, 24 April 2008 (UTC)
- You've already said that on the RFC page. Why are you wasting your time and everyone elses by repeating yourself? William M. Connolley (talk) 20:01, 24 April 2008 (UTC)
- Because apparently you don't understand. ~ UBeR (talk) 20:10, 24 April 2008 (UTC)
- WMC has a new strategy now. Instead of blocking you himself, he asks another administrator to do it for him. He has done this to me twice in two days, over a dispute in an article on (gasp-- you guessed it) a global warming skeptic.FellGleaming (talk) 21:25, 25 April 2008 (UTC)
- Because apparently you don't understand. ~ UBeR (talk) 20:10, 24 April 2008 (UTC)
- You've already said that on the RFC page. Why are you wasting your time and everyone elses by repeating yourself? William M. Connolley (talk) 20:01, 24 April 2008 (UTC)
- Yes, I understood, but I thought you should know anyway. ~ UBeR (talk) 18:35, 24 April 2008 (UTC)
- I'll assume that was a joke. In case you've actually misunderstood, the question is, what should happen to this RFC William M. Connolley (talk) 18:23, 24 April 2008 (UTC)
Ah... [1] and [2]. OK, if its not a proper RFC, I'd like to mv it into my user space please William M. Connolley (talk) 18:08, 24 April 2008 (UTC)