User talk:William Leadford

Hello, William Leadford, and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place. If you are stuck, and looking for help, just type {{helpme}} and your question here on your user talk page, and a more experienced Wikipedian will show up shortly to answer. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

It might seem a lot but you'll get the hang of it and there's plenty of people out there willing to help out. I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! If you have any questions, see the help pages or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome!--Technopat (talk) 22:51, 19 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the welcome Technopat. I was just looking at a few H. G. Wells articles and thought they could do with a bit of buffing up. I'll certainly take the time to look through your links, and try to make sure I do it right. --William Leadford (talk) 22:55, 19 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Greetings William Leadford - thanks for the thanks. There's plenty of buffing up to be done, so enjoy it! Just two bits of advice: don't let it become habit-forming, and don't let 'em get you down! Cheers!--Technopat (talk) 23:14, 19 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

British Motorcycles

Thanks for the work you are doing on British bike manufacturers it's good to see someone else taking an interest. When you've got a moment have a look at the WikiProject Motorcycling/British Motorcycles (we've not got many members) and the Outline of motorcycling we've just started. Thruxton (talk) 18:21, 19 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

That's a relief. I thought when I saw the orange bar that someone might be coming here to tell me off for something. :-) I'm interested in old machinery in general, not just motorbikes, so I doubt I'd be much help with the project to be honest. I'll keep gnoming away at the older stuff though. William Leadford (talk) 19:03, 19 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Any help is very welcome - especially the attention to detail stuff you are good at. I'm a fan of HG and had a look at In the Days of the Comet. It is unreferenced (the facsimile doesn't count) but The War of the Worlds has got 49 good refs so its worth thinking about? I did find it on Project Gutenberg so added it as an 'external link' Thruxton (talk) 20:38, 20 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Comparing it to similar articles it seems to me there's an awful lot missing from that article, as it doesn't really cover anything except the plot. William Leadford (talk) 14:07, 21 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Well done

	The Working Wikipedian's Barnstar
	This award is in recognition of good work improving motorcycle related articles Thruxton (talk) 18:48, 5 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Lodi_Road

Thanks for copyediting Lodi_Road - you've made a decent job of it, which I couldn't get my head round. I'm not sure why you removed the references tag as well as the copyedit one, though. It still needs references per WP:RS and WP:Verify, so I've added that tag back. Cheers. - Sitush (talk) 17:21, 13 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

It was rather difficult to follow, so I did the best I could with it. I removed the {{unreferenced}} tag, which was no longer true, but of course you're right in saying that it needs more. William Leadford (talk) 18:40, 13 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Amby

Good work fixing the Amby article. Keep it up! ⊂| Mr.choppers |⊃ (talk) 00:09, 18 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Friedrich Wilhelm Mengelberg

If you have time, could you proofread this article above I just wrote. Thanks.--Doug Coldwell ^talk 17:02, 1 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, great job! --Doug Coldwell ^talk 22:05, 1 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I'm afraid that I've edit conflicted with you, so some of your intermediate edits have been lost; I should probably have put that template on the page warning that there was a large edit underway. Sorry about that. William Leadford (talk) 22:23, 1 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I'll fix tomorrow. It will give me something to do. Mostly I just changed some pictures. You copyedit a lot better than I do.--Doug Coldwell ^talk 22:26, 1 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. That's a nice little article, but the lead obviously needs to be expanded a bit still. William Leadford (talk) 22:29, 1 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This article is kind of important, since it then puts me at 200 DYKs. It has been approved and in the long clue to come up in a couple of weeks as an actual DYK. If you see any other improvements, I'll not edit it for a day or so, so you can make any changes. The pictures I can change anytime. They show the interiors of the churches he worked on.--Doug Coldwell ^talk 22:36, 1 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I'm done now, time for bed anyway. All I'd suggest is expanding the lead. William Leadford (talk) 22:41, 1 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I'll think on it and see what I can come up with.--Doug Coldwell ^talk 22:42, 1 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I've seen others suggest that a good general rule is to include something from each section of the article in the lead, and that seems to make sense to me. William Leadford (talk) 22:53, 1 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Took a sentence from another section and added to lead.--Doug Coldwell ^talk 23:04, 1 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Done --Doug Coldwell ^talk 23:21, 1 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

New Page Patrol survey

New page patrol – Survey Invitation

Hello William Leadford! The WMF is currently developing new tools to make new page patrolling much easier. Whether you have patrolled many pages or only a few, we now need to know about your experience. The survey takes only 6 minutes, and the information you provide will not be shared with third parties other than to assist us in analyzing the results of the survey; the WMF will not use the information to identify you.

If this invitation also appears on other accounts you may have, please complete the survey once only.
If this has been sent to you in error and you have never patrolled new pages, please ignore it.

Please click HERE to take part.
Many thanks in advance for providing this essential feedback.

You are receiving this invitation because you have patrolled new pages. For more information, please see NPP Survey. Global message delivery 13:54, 26 October 2011 (UTC)

GOCE newsletter

Greetings from the Guild of Copy Editors

Elections are currently underway for our third tranche of Guild coordinators. The voting period will run for 14 days: 00:01 UTC, 16 December – 23:59 UTC, 31 December. All GOCE members, as well as past participants of any of the Guild's Backlog elimination drives, are eligible to vote. There are five candidates vying for four positions. Your vote really matters! Cast your vote today.

Sent on behalf of the Guild of Copy Editors using AWB on 11:42, 21 December 2011 (UTC)

GOCE 2011 Year-End Report

Guild of Copy Editors 2011 Year-End Report

We have reached the end of the year, and what a year it has been! The Guild of Copy Editors was full of activity, and we achieved numerous important milestones in 2011. Read all about these in the Guild's 2011 Year-End Report.

Highlights

Membership grows to 764 editors, an increase of 261
Report on coordinators' elections
Around 1,000 articles removed through six Backlog elimination drives
Guild Plans for 2012
Requests page report
Sign up for the January 2012 Backlog elimination drive!

Get your copy of the Guild's 2011 Year-End Report here
On behalf of the Guild, we take this opportunity to wish you Season's Greetings and Happy New Year. We look forward to your support in 2012!
– Your 2011 Coordinators: Diannaa (lead), The Utahraptor, and Slon02 and SMasters (emeritus).

Sent on behalf of the Guild of Copy Editors using AWB on 07:38, 2 January 2012 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:23, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]