Jump to content

User talk:Willdasmiffking

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Talk to me - Don't annoy me though.



British Empire
Flag of British Empire
The areas of the world that at one time were part of the British Empire. Current British overseas territories are underlined in red.
The areas of the world that at one time were part of the British Empire. Current British overseas territories are underlined in red.


[edit]

August 2012

[edit]

Hello, I'm Vertium. I wanted to let you know that I undid one of your recent contributions, such as the one you made to Bruno Mars, because it didn't appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Vertium When all is said and done 22:56, 5 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Adolf Hitler. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Δρ.Κ. λόγοςπράξις 22:58, 5 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Tony Blair, you may be blocked from editing. Δρ.Κ. λόγοςπράξις 22:59, 5 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for persistent vandalism. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Mark Arsten (talk) 23:21, 5 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

September 2012

[edit]

This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Tony Blair, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Escape Orbit (Talk) 20:41, 18 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. – Connormah (talk) 21:17, 18 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I hadn't recieved the warning before I did the 2nd one!

If you would like to request unblock, please read the instructions in the template above. – Connormah (talk) 21:52, 18 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
You have a long history of vandalism like this and have been warned many times before, so you can hardly claim it has come as a surprise to you that you are not to repeatedly vandalise articles. --Escape Orbit

(Talk) 22:01, 18 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, but I also have made numerous constructive edits, if you haven't noticed. And besides, prove to me that Hitler's middle name wasn't Basil. I could be deadly serious for all you know!

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Willdasmiffking (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

I hadn't recieved the first warning before I made the second edit, so how could I know I was doing anything wrong?

Decline reason:

Perhaps you are deadly serious, which means it's even more important to keep you blocked. --jpgordon::==( o ) 22:09, 18 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Please don;t abuse your ability to edit this page - the sole reason you should be is discussion of this block. I do note that you have made constructive edits, but you have previously been blocked for vandalism and that didn't seem to send you the message that those edits are not tolerated, hence the indef this time around. – Connormah (talk) 22:13, 18 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Since you completely disregarded the above and heeded it with a personal attack, I have disabled your ability to edit this page. If you are really serious about unblocking, you are still welcome to appeal this through the unblock ticket request system. Thanks. – Connormah (talk) 22:17, 18 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]