User talk:WillBond

A reference problem

Hi! Some users have been working hard on Category:Pages with broken reference names.

Here you added a new reference Thinking , Huard lifts Chiefs, Controversy but didn't define it. This has been showing as an error at the bottom of the article. "Cite error: The named reference REFNAME was invoked but never defined (see the help page)." Can you take a look and work out what you were trying to do? Thanks -- Frze ^{> talk} 10:36, 30 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

WillBond, you are invited to the Teahouse

Hi WillBond! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from peers and experienced editors. I hope to see you there! Ushau97 (I'm a Teahouse host)

Visit the Teahouse

This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 20:42, 30 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Radja Nainggolan

Hi there from Portugal,

please respect other people's work and allow the current version to remain. We don't write the date of birth (in this case 4 May 1988) in another place than intro and box. Also, even though REF#3 (which i doubled to REF#5 because it's the same source) is not from La Gazzetta dello Sport and i corrected it (it's from IL VERO MILANISTA), you reverted me.

Also, the section is supposed to have spacings, not be written in one same sentence. Much more serious, i inserted translations in ENGLISH of the ITALIAN and (one) INDONESIAN sources, you reverted me and removed them all! Why can i ask?

Attentively --AL (talk) 23:44, 8 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Multiple accounts

Hello, can you confirm you are operating the following account: Srcevatreno (talk · contribs). Cheers, Mattythewhite (talk) 00:06, 9 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

January 2014

This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sock puppet that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sock puppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Mattythewhite (talk) 16:13, 9 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]