User talk:Wilky DiFendare

April 2008

Please stop introducing jokes into articles, such as those you created at User talk:68.181.242.118. Wikipedia is a serious encyclopedia, and contributions of this type are considered vandalism. Continuing to add jokes and other disruptive content into articles may lead to you being blocked from editing. MBisanz ^talk 06:12, 4 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I'm sorry to hear that my stern warning of a vandal I reverted is being taken as a joke. I will attempt to be a more austere editor in the future. Wilky DiFendare (talk) 06:47, 4 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not attack other editors. If you continue, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. MBisanz ^talk 06:52, 4 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. You will be blocked from editing the next time you vandalize a page, as you did with this edit to Waitaki Boys' High School. Steve Crossin (talk to me) 06:52, 4 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

That was reversion of an anon's vanity entry, not vandalism. It's easy to see why the mistake was made since the reversion had a snarky edit summary.-gadfium 08:14, 4 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for repeated abuse of editing privileges. If you believe this block is unjustified you may contest this block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below.

Rudget (review) 17:52, 4 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Wilky DiFendare (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I am a fearless and valiant vandal reverter and this accusation of vandalism is odious. Please point me to a diff where I have vandalised The Wikipedia. I am here to defend the wiki against trolls, stalkers, harassers, pranksters, buffoons and nincompoops. Do you disagree with my objectives? I am a fine upstanding Wikipedian. I don't understand why you are obstructing me from this goal. Please inform JzG of this block, for he is the moral compass of this Wiki and he will see this block for what it is: unjust, unrighteous and distasteful. I have a lot of work to do on behalf of some Great Wikipedians, please allow me to perform it. Wilky DiFendare (talk) 18:07, 4 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Sigh... It is more funny off-wiki. — -- lucasbfr ^talk 21:30, 4 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

I am requesting the assistance of JzG per your request. Rudget (review) 18:09, 4 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I'm certainly puzzled. Your edits are appropriate vandalism reversion, but your confusingly insulting edit-summaries and the confusingly disruptive post to the administrators' noticeboard are very strange, and your reference to Daniel Brandt makes it clear that you aren't new to Wikipedia. What was your previous username? -FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 21:31, 4 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

His previous username is The Defender of the Wiki. It's unknown who he is/was before that. --Random832 (contribs) 14:13, 7 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]