User talk:Wilbertyl

June 2007

Please refrain from introducing inappropriate pages to Wikipedia. Doing so is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you.CIreland 03:00, 16 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Smd repair tool, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be blatant advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the general criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item 11, as well as the guidelines on spam.

If you can indicate why the subject of this article is not blatant advertising, you may contest the tagging. To do this, please add {{hangon}} on the top of the page and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would help make it encyclopedic, as well as adding any citations from reliable sources to ensure that the article will be verifiable. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. -- Anonymous Dissident ^Talk -- (dated 03:45, 16 June 2007 UTC)

August 2007

A tag has been placed on Manila hotel, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. If you plan to expand the article, you can request that administrators wait a while for you to add contextual material. To do this, affix the template {{hangon}} to the article and state your intention on the article's talk page. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. GlassCobra (talk • contribs) 07:57, 27 August 2007 (UTC) Warning has been redacted. GlassCobra (talk • contribs) 09:50, 28 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Manila Hotel

Hey! I've been doing a bit of research for this article, and it's definitely quite notable. I'd like to apologize for assuming that it was ever anything but; the title originally made it seem quite generic. As you can see, I've already done a fair bit of revamping on the article, including removing the CSD notice and replacing it with {{underconstruction}}, an in-progress template signifying that the article is undergoing a major improvement.

I'd like to propose a deal: if you find more notable sources like the ones from the New York Times and leave them on my talk page, I will rewrite the article and get it up to an acceptable standard. Does that sound okay? GlassCobra (talk • contribs) 10:35, 27 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hello again! Just thought you'd like to know I've finished up edits to Manila Hotel. Tell me what you think! GlassCobra (talk • contribs) 09:50, 28 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Domingo Lam-co

The article Domingo Lam-co has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Notability is not apparent

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Avi (talk) 04:49, 30 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

More information needed about File:Lapu.JPG

Hello, Wilbertyl!

It was really helpful of you to you to upload File:Lapu.JPG. However, we need to properly format the image license information in order to keep and use new images.

If you can edit the description and add one of these templates, that would be great. If you're not sure how or would like some help, please ask us at the media copyright questions page and we'll be happy to assist you.

Thanks again! --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 19:05, 16 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree File:Lapu.JPG

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Lapu.JPG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Fut.Perf. ☼ 19:09, 16 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]