User talk:WiktorLinus

Welcome!

Hello, WiktorLinus! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. You may benefit from following some of the links below, which will help you get the most out of Wikipedia. If you have any questions you can ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking

or by typing four tildes "~~~~"; this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you are already excited about Wikipedia, you might want to consider being "adopted" by a more experienced editor or joining a WikiProject to collaborate with others in creating and improving articles of your interest. Click here for a directory of all the WikiProjects. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field when making edits to pages. Happy editing! Peaceray (talk) 22:13, 7 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Getting Started
Contributing to Wikipedia • Tutorial • Your first article The five pillars of Wikipedia • Simplified ruleset How to: edit a page • upload an image
Getting Help
Frequently Asked Questions Directories and indexes Where to: ask questions • make requests Tip of the day Request administrator attention
Policies and Guidelines
Neutral point of view • Reliable sources Verifiability • Citing sources • No original research What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons Manual of Style (Simplified) • Three-revert rule Copyrights • Non-free content • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism • Sock puppetry Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability

The Community
Community Portal • Adopt-a-user program Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • Resolving disputes Build consensus • Village pump IRC channels • Mailing lists The Signpost (Wikipedia's newspaper)
Things to do
Be bold in editing • Help develop an article Maintenance • Peer review • Requested articles Join a WikiProject • Translating articles Cleaning up: General • Spam • Vandalism
Miscellaneous
Categories • Disambiguity • Stubs User pages • Talk pages Useful templates • Tools • User scripts

Your submission at Articles for creation: Fabian Egger (November 8)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by KartikeyaS343 were:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Fabian Egger and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Fabian Egger, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

KartikeyaS (talk) 07:20, 8 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, WiktorLinus! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! KartikeyaS (talk) 07:20, 8 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Paid editing disclosure

Thank you for disclosing your paid editing status, but that's not enough. As per WP:PAID you are also required to provide links to your profiles on all sites where you "advertise, solicit or obtain paid Wikipedia-editing services" to fully comply with the policy. GSS ^💬 03:38, 8 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Apologies for not posting this. I actually do not advertise anywhere, but I have now stated the source of my jobs in my userpage. Please check and review the Draft:Ronny Hadani page. WiktorLinus (talk) 21:04, 8 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, GSS. you have placed all my current AFCs on hold and stated, "Possible WP:MEAT/WP:SOCK; Please wait till the investigation is over see Wikipedia:List of paid editing companies#Submit Express." Can you send me a link to the investigation? I am not finding it anywhere. Also, I do not have multiple accounts. I am an ethical editor that complies with all Wikipedia policies. I have disclosed paid editing as required. If you have any evidence or reason for believing I have multiple accounts, please explain. And which other account do you think is me? Please explain, otherwise I will wait a couple of days and resubmit the pages. WiktorLinus (talk) 01:27, 12 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

On your user page you disclosed that you are working for "Submit Express" and as per some off-wiki evidence the freelancer who was hired to create David Bohigian has a long history of undisclosed paid editing so you can't edit on their behalf. @MER-C and GeneralNotability: please check your inbox with latest findings. Thank you, GSS ^💬 04:21, 12 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

To GSS, MER-C and GeneralNotability: Regarding David Bohigian, I am the one who created it and I have disclosed paid editing. I have only created 5 pages and I have disclosed paid editing on all of them and submitted to AFC. Which other pages are you referring to? Please explain. I am aware that David Bohigian previously had a page which was removed for copyright violation. I have no idea who created it before, but it was not me. You say "the freelancer who was hired to create David Bohigian has a long history of undisclosed paid editing" but this has nothing to do with me. Could you tell me which Freelancer you are referring to? Is this person that originally created the page? If so, this has nothing to do with me. I have complied with all Wiki terms and I am an ethical editor. Please provide me with details of the off-wiki evidence you are referring to. WiktorLinus (talk) 21:17, 12 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The freelancer who is hired for this project is the founder of the company you disclosed on your userpage and they have a long history of undisclosed paid editing so until they disclose all their accounts and paid edits you are not allowed to edit on their behalf it's a violation of WP:MEAT. GSS ^💬 02:54, 13 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ronny Hadani (January 19)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by GSS were:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Sources are passing mentions, press releases, interviews, profiles and a few unreliable.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Ronny Hadani and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Ronny Hadani, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

GSS ^💬 03:27, 19 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:GEP (Company)

Hello, WiktorLinus. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:GEP (Company), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 04:01, 11 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]