User talk:Wikiwriter82015

Wikiwriter82015, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Wikiwriter82015! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from peers and experienced editors. I hope to see you there! Soni (I'm a Teahouse host)

Visit the Teahouse

This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 17:21, 29 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

July 2015

Your recent editing history at S/2009 S 1 shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you get reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Favonian (talk) 17:52, 30 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:

Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment; or
With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button ( or ) located above the edit window.

This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.

Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 18:01, 30 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

August 2015

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for edit warring, as you did at S/2009 S 1. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. Favonian (talk) 10:38, 2 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Wikiwriter82015 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I dont believe that I have done anything wrong. I felt that something was significant enough to be added to a Wikipedia page and I put it on there from an unbiased point of view (See the more recent edits. The first few were not neccesarrily neutral but that was brought to my attn and was fixed for the later versions of the page that i was undoing to in the edit war). Then a few editors were upset personally by the content posted on the page and letting their feelings about the content push them away from a neutral point of view, made them delete the changes , corrupting the neutral flow of infornmation and keeping this infornmation from the public all because what was posted was about the controversial topic of claiming space. But it was presented from a neutral point of view (. I believed that my version was correct and they believed that theirs was and an edit war ensued. I tried to talk but the other side and i both made things worse and then the administrator, who i believves is biased on the topic along with the other two editors who i was warring with, banned me and edited the page back, getting himself further involved and further showing that he is taking sides. I dont understand why i should be banned for doing what i feel is right. There is a conversation that went on on this talk page of the administrator (Favonian's talk page) and the page being edit warred is thia one, S/2009 S 1. Thanks for considering my claims. Wikiwriter82015 (talk) 17:32, 2 August 2015 (UTC) Wikiwriter82015 (talk) 17:32, 2 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

The policy is very simple: no edit warring, even if you're right. Max Semenik (talk) 18:04, 2 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

But lets say I am right. I dont understand how my version of the page could stay since editors keep deleting it and continue to have a different opinion that i cant succeed in changing. Is there anything i can do to ensure my version of the page is not deleted that way i dont have to revert to edit warring. To: User:MaxSem From:Wikiwriter82015 (talk) 18:11, 2 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You're supposed to discuss the situation and reach consensus. Max Semenik (talk) 18:22, 2 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

But on the BRD page, it says this:In general, BRD will fail if:

There is a (large) preexisting consensus in the general community against the specific change you'd like to make.

And that is true so I would like to know if there is another way that i can come up with a compromise with the opposing editors. I have tried BRD to a certain extent and more and more people come out against me and they are backing one qnother up and reaffirming eachothers opinions against me and are promoting those opinions and trying to gang up against me instead of promoting change and the more people who get brought out against me, the less these editors think of compromise and the more they feel that i am wrong. And i am eager to keep talking but I am blocked and can only do so on my page. Please help me find a construdtive solution to this. Wikiwriter82015 (talk) 18:35, 2 August 2015 (UTC) To: User:MaxSem[reply]

If there is consensus against your edits, you should drop the stick. Continuing reinserting them no matter what is edit-warring and that's how you got blocked. Continuing down this road after your block expires will result in more, longer blocks. Max Semenik (talk) 19:06, 2 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]