User talk:Wikiwriter125

This is Wikiwriter125's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Your submission at Articles for creation: The International action group for peace in Libya (October 24)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by AngusWOOF were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:The International action group for peace in Libya and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:The International action group for peace in Libya, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 22:00, 24 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Wikiwriter125! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 22:00, 24 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Middle East and Mediterranean Peace Research Institute moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Middle East and Mediterranean Peace Research Institute, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. K.e.coffman (talk) 04:11, 27 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The article has triggered a spam filter; that's why I'm moving it into draft space. After improvements, please submit via WP:AFC. K.e.coffman (talk) 04:11, 27 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Managing a conflict of interest

Hello, Wikiwriter125. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about in the page Draft:Middle East and Mediterranean Peace Research Institute, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a COI may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, company, organization or competitors;
propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (see the {{request edit}} template);
disclose your COI when discussing affected articles (see WP:DISCLOSE);
avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see WP:SPAM);
do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation (see WP:PAID).

Also please note that editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. K.e.coffman (talk) 04:12, 27 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Middle East and Mediterranean Peace Research Institute (October 28)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by AngusWOOF were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Middle East and Mediterranean Peace Research Institute and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Middle East and Mediterranean Peace Research Institute, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 20:57, 28 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:The International action group for peace in Libya

Hello, Wikiwriter125. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "The International action group for peace in Libya".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. GamerPro64 04:25, 3 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

September 2019

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for advertising or promotion. From your contributions, this seems to be your only purpose.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. MER-C 12:44, 7 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Wikiwriter125 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Dear Sir, Madam,

I found this message: This user is currently blocked.The latest block log entry is provided below for reference: 12:44, 7 September 2019 MER-C talk contribs blocked Wikiwriter125 talk contribs with an expiration time of indefinite (account creation blocked) (Spam / advertising-only account, likely covert advertising) Blocking of my account is because of editing article about an international person Mr Mahmoud Refaat and the admin who made it is accusing me of advertising.. HOW AND WHICH PRODUCT?Mr Mahmoud Refaat is only a peace-advocate, NOT a business man.

I do NOT make any advertise to Mr Mahmoud Refaat neither to any one else, I am an independent journalist and do NOT even know Mr Mahmoud Refaat personally, all the story is; I wrote about him as I am following his activities in Yemen and Libya as these 2 countries are my focus point because of wars in both of them. Finally, if you want, I can send you all my details with my press card if you want.Finally, I hope Saudi Arabia and UAE hands did NOT reach Wikipedia (as Mahmoud Refaat is peace advocate in countries were the commit war crimes as Yemen & Libya). so hope and what happened is simple mistake to be corrected by returning the page I edited and unblocking me. Sincerely

Decline reason:

Your answer to KillerChihuahua below indicates to me that it is in the best interests of the project to leave you blocked for the time being. SQL ^{Query me!} 20:44, 1 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Well, promotion of a person is also considered to fall under the "advertising" umbrella. Wikiwriter125, Would you promise NOT to edit articles about Mahmoud Refaat or any related topic? Killer Chihuahua 01:24, 17 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Dear KillerChihuahua , to answer your question:

I did not make any promotion to a person, despite I admit my mistake in the way I edited the article with, that why I would kindly ask you or other admin to correct my faults of editing as you are more experienced than me. BUT the article Mahmoud Refaat is existing in French and Arabic Wikipedia, and MUST be on English Wikipedia. AGAIN, I do not believe the blocking and deleting the article by the admin MER-C is normal, in particular the page Mahmoud Refaat is existing on French Wikipedia https://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mahmoud_Refaat and Arabic Wikipedia https://ar.wikipedia.org/wiki/%D9%85%D8%AD%D9%85%D9%88%D8%AF_%D8%B1%D9%81%D8%B9%D8%AA.

- - - - .

To ^{Query me!}.

Your intervention is very weird. I posed an IDEA, the page Mahmoud Refaat SHOULD be on English Wikipedia and I gave reasons why, while you did NOT handle the idea and entered with logic of power showing you are admin, addressing to me the phrase (( best interests of the project to leave you blocked for the time being)) which is almost insult. PLEASE BE INFORMED WE ARE IN AN INTELLECTUAL COMMUNITY ACCORDINGLY LOGIC MUST BE THE POWER NOT YOUR BEING ABLE TO BLOCK SOMEONE also please be advised such reaction is NOT civilized.

This blocked user is asking that their block be reviewed on the Unblock Ticket Request System:

Wikiwriter125 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

UTRS appeal #27023 was submitted on Oct 06, 2019 17:40:31. This review is now closed.

--UTRSBot (talk) 17:40, 6 October 2019 (UTC) [reply]

This blocked user is asking that their block be reviewed on the Unblock Ticket Request System:

Wikiwriter125 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

UTRS appeal #27202 was submitted on Oct 18, 2019 15:28:18. This review is now closed.

--UTRSBot (talk) 15:28, 18 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your UTRS appeal

A couple of notes regarding the appeals you continue to make via UTRS:

Your insistence that the appeal be handled via UTRS instead of here is irrelevant. All Wikipedia administrators are able to review appeals in both locations, and the consensus of the community is that appeals are held on Wikipedia unless there are specific privacy reasons to conduct the appeal elsewhere or the blocked editor no longer has access to their talk page.
You continue to assert that the fact that there is a Mahmoud Refaat article in other language Wikipedias requires us to include the article here. This belief has no basis in policy and is flat out incorrect.
You state that you will be ignoring the reason for your block because you disagree with it. Your acknowledgement of the block and agreement to avoid future instances of the same behaviour is a requirement for an unblock to be considered. As long as you take this approach any unblock appeal will be declined outright.

Your options are to review the guide to appealing blocks and to post a valid appeal here on this talk page. Any further UTRS appeals made while you still have access to this talk page will result in your access to UTRS being revoked.-- Jezebel's Ponyo^{bons mots} 17:14, 18 October 2019 (UTC) ‎[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Jezebel's Ponyo^{bons mots} 17:18, 18 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Well, all of the above is now moot as this is a confirmed sock account. Block adjusted.-- Jezebel's Ponyo^{bons mots} 17:18, 18 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Wikiwriter125 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I did not make any promotion to a person neither advertise the page Mahmoud Refaat. I tried several times to obtain an answer from the admin who blocked me about explanation, why did he consider this page as advertise or promotion despite its existing on other Wikipedia languages but he NEVER answered, meanwhile he is blocking me of contacting him through his page!!! The only thing I could find violating in the article Mahmoud Refaat is that, I stated his twitter account as source, but I do not think that deserves deleting the page and blocking me, such unintentional mistake could be corrected less severely. Meanwhile, I found the message of blocking from the admin Jezebel's Ponyobons mots: saying blocked for using multiple accounts and adding multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons.. Would you please let me know what is the illegitimate behavior I did? For above reasons, I would like to have explanation from the admin blocked me based on what did he judge that I am advertising and promoting page, and ask to be unblocked and republishing the page Mahmoud Refaat because it's illogical to be considered in English Wikipedia as advertise while it's existing in more than other Wikipedia languages with same information.

Decline reason:

(1) You have blatantly and unambiguously edited to promote a person and his reputation. You openly declare that you intend to do the same again, and have no intention of changing your ways. We do not unblock editors who inform us that if they are unblocked they fully intend to edit in ways which are contrary to Wikipedia policy. That alone would justify declining your unblock request. (2) You repeatedly deny that your editing was promotional. If you honestly can't understand how what you were doing was promotional then even if decided to try to comply with Wikipedia policy on promotion you wouldn't be able to, so there is no question of your being unblocked. That alone would justify declining your unblock request. (3) Did you take the advice above to read the guide to appealling blocks before making your request? If you did then you will have known that your unblock request was unlikely to succeed for several reasons, including WP:NOTTHEM. That alone would justify declining your unblock request. JBW (talk) Formerly JamesBWatson 21:25, 3 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.