User talk:Wikiuser100/archive 6 (2013)
Invitation to WikiProject Hotels
[edit] Hello, Wikiuser100.
You are invited to join WikiProject Hotels, a WikiProject and resource dedicated to improving Wikipedia's coverage of hotels, motels and lodging-related topics. |
---|
Promoting some smile
[edit]Hello Wikiuser100, Eduemoni↑talk↓ has given you a shinning smiling star! You see, these things promote WikiLove and hopefully this has made your day better. Spread the Shinning Smiling Star whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or someone putting up with some stick at this time. Enjoy! |
- I'm not sure what I've done to earn this seeming Random Aact of Kindness but am grateful just the same, User Eduemoni. Cheers, Wikiuser100 (talk) 15:03, 10 March 2013 (UTC)
- I think that, the reason for being eligible to this award is pretty simple, just being a wikipedian, spread and share the luv. Regards Eduemoni↑talk↓ 03:55, 13 March 2013 (UTC)
A barnstar for you!
[edit]The Copyeditor's Barnstar | |
For all the good work that you have done in Wikipedia.
Best regards, |
- Thank you, User Codename Lisa. I'm flattered, and grateful. It is indeed very nice to be acknowledged. Yours. Wikiuser100 (talk) 20:34, 11 March 2013 (UTC)
Wambach article
[edit]Hello, as you have previously contributed to the Abby Wambach article, please consider sharing your input in this discussion: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of international goals scored by Abby Wambach Thank you. Hmlarson (talk) 22:10, 12 April 2013 (UTC)
Care to take another pass at the Weetamoo article?
[edit]Greetings, Wikuser100! Even after adding a bunch of inline cites to the Weetamoo article, it's still not clear to me exactly what the facts are. Perhaps you can look this over and figure it out? Djembayz (talk) 01:52, 24 April 2013 (UTC)
Ordering of sections for medical content
[edit]Guideline is here WP:MEDMOS. Thanks. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) (if I write on your page reply on mine) 07:38, 4 May 2013 (UTC)
November 2013
[edit] You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.
Please be particularly aware, Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states:
- Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made; that is to say, editors are not automatically "entitled" to three reverts.
- Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.
If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. JOJ Hutton 20:57, 27 November 2013 (UTC)
- As you've reverted twice today by 2 different editors and warned JOJ for his one revert, I suggest you work this out on the talk page. Dougweller (talk) 21:58, 27 November 2013 (UTC)
- Glad this nonsense was worked out. Quite Orwellian. Wikiuser100 (talk) 15:01, 30 November 2013 (UTC)