User talk:Wikiupdater2017

This is Wikiupdater2017's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Jason Wilk (December 18)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SK2242 was:

This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject.

The comment the reviewer left was:

If you are connected to the subject in any way, please disclose this as you would have a conflict of interest. While you are not prohibited from writing about someone you have a CoI with, you are strongly advised against it, as it can be hard for someone with a CoI to write from a complete neutral point of view. Please also note that if you are paid to write this, you are required to disclose it on your user page. See your talk page for more info. The draft is currently written from a promotional point of view. Write from a neutral point of view. Every sentence must cite a reliable source to comply with the Wikipedia policy on verifiability. Please also find at least 3 independent reliable sources that talk about the subject in detail (not just mentions) to show notability. For examples of reliable and unreliable sources, see Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Perennial sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Jason Wilk and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Jason Wilk, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

SK2242 (talk) 00:09, 18 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Wikiupdater2017! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! SK2242 (talk) 00:09, 18 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

December 2020

Hello Wikiupdater2017. The nature of your edits, such as the one you made to Draft:Jason Wilk, gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are extremely strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Wikiupdater2017. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Wikiupdater2017|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. SK2242 (talk) 00:10, 18 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! This is my first time making a wikipedia page so please excuse me if I have erred. I am still learning what to do. I updated the language to reflect a neutral tone but have not yet published. I am connected to the company but when I enter the following

Wikiupdater2017, in accordance with the Wikimedia Foundation's Terms of Use, discloses that they have been paid by Dave for their contributions to Wikipedia.

I receive an error. Where did I go wrong? Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Wikiupdater2017 (talk • contribs) 01:27, 18 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Click this link and you can place the template on there. SK2242 (talk) 06:48, 18 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. I believe I did that. I appreciate your help.Wikiupdater2017 (talk) 17:22, 18 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi SK2242, is there anything else I need to do in order to submit this for approval?Wikiupdater2017 (talk) 15:14, 22 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

There is still some promotional language present, such as "over 13 years of experience building digital companies". Also some sentences are unsourced. SK2242 (talk) 15:24, 22 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks again for your help, SK2242! Appreciate it! I revised language once again added a bunch more references.Wikiupdater2017 (talk) 19:20, 22 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi SK2242, is there anything else I need to do in order to submit this for approval? I cleared all promotional language. Thank you.Wikiupdater2017 (talk) 02:15, 23 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Jason Wilk (January 23)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SK2242 was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Needs more references like the CNBC one to show notability, as the other sources are either not independent (interviews) or aren’t significant coverage. The second Forbes source should be replaced; Forbes articles written by "contributors" are unreliable. It’s preferred the Business Insider source is replaced as well as it has an unclear reliability.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Jason Wilk and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Jason Wilk, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

SK2242 (talk) 02:23, 23 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Jason Wilk (June 22)

Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by DGG was: This submission is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia. The comment the reviewer left was: Advertising. Do not resubmit

DGG ( talk ) 01:33, 22 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Jason Wilk

Hello, Wikiupdater2017. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Jason Wilk, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 02:01, 22 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]