User talk:Wikisaichan

Welcome!

Hello, Wikisaichan, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Sairu, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! --Animalparty! (talk) 23:34, 31 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Sairu

The article Sairu has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. --Animalparty! (talk) 23:34, 31 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Suitable references for Sairu

As a brand new editor, you may not be familiar with Wikipedia's standards for what is a reliable source. I recommend reading the article about it, because what you have been adding to the Sairu article will mostly be removed. Blog posts and YouTube videos are not generally reliable - there is no editorial oversight, they are self published, and they generally are not verifiable. I would hate to see you spending your time on something that will just be removed: better to go for good quality references that will stick.--Gronk Oz (talk) 22:42, 1 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

January 2016

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed maintenance templates from Sairu. When removing maintenance templates, please be sure to either resolve the problem that the template refers to, or give a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, as your removal of this template has been reverted. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Maintenance tags are not a criticism of an article or of the editor who wrote it. Instead, they serve to help editors to find and improve articles. In the case of Sairu, for example, you removed the orphan template even though the article is still an orphan; no other articles have links to it. Please do not remove these templates unless the problem has actually been fixed. Gronk Oz (talk) 15:16, 2 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Managing a conflict of interest

Hello, Wikisaichan. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with some of the people, places or things you have written about in the article Sairu, you may have a conflict of interest. People with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have a conflict of interest, see the conflict of interest guideline and frequently asked questions for organizations. In particular, please:

avoid editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, its competitors, or projects and products you or they are involved with;
instead, propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (see the {{request edit}} template);
avoid linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see WP:SPAM);
exercise great caution so that you do not violate Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use require disclosure of your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation.

Please familiarize yourself with relevant policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, sourcing, and autobiographies. Thank you. --Animalparty! (talk) 20:32, 2 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

January 2016

Please do not remove maintenance templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Sairu, without resolving the problem that the template refers to, or giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your removal of this template does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Before removing a maintenance template, discuss on the article's Talk page to agree with the other editors whether the problem has been fixed. If you don't understand what it means, then ask - do not just remove the template. This is very disruptive to Wikipedia. Gronk Oz (talk) 13:39, 3 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Sairu

The article Sairu has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

References do not prove notability, most of the references are from personal websites such as Facebook and others are from YouTube.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Ana r chyte 11:22, 5 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

January 2016

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Sairu, you may be blocked from editing. Again, you have removed the maintenance templates from this page without making any attempt to discuss the problems on the Talk page and gain a consensus. This is getting very disruptive and makes it harder to evaluate the proposals to delete this article; if the article was in better shape, it would be clearer to editors what the claim to notability is. You are undermining the article by this continued vandalism. Gronk Oz (talk) 17:13, 5 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Sairu for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Sairu is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sairu until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 21:37, 12 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]