User talk:Wikipro43245

Wikipro43245, you are invited to the Teahouse

Hi Wikipro43245! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from peers and experienced editors. I hope to see you there! SarahStierch (I'm a Teahouse host)

Visit the Teahouse

This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 16:09, 7 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

August 2020

Your recent bold edit has been reverted. Per the bold, revert, discuss cycle, after a bold edit is reverted, the status quo should remain while a discussion is started instead of edit-warring, and it should be resolved before reinstating the edit, after a needed consensus is formed to keep it. Woodroar (talk) 15:40, 9 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome!

Hi Wikipro43245! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date.

Happy editing! Wiki Macaroons^Cinnamon? 16:14, 9 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the welcome message WikiMacaroons (talk). It's warmly received but I've been here for over six years. Wikipro43245 (talk) 16:39, 9 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, I just noticed you restarted editing today for the first time since 2014 and had never been properly welcomed Wiki Macaroons^Cinnamon? 16:42, 9 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks WikiMacaroons (talk) I appreciate it. Wikipro43245 (talk) 16:43, 9 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

August 2020

Your recent editing history at Kanye West shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. – Muboshgu (talk) 22:23, 9 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I appreciate that you began a discussion on Talk:Kanye West, but this message is to make sure that you are aware that if you undo my edit, that would put you over the limit of the three-revert rule. Continue seeking consensus on the talk page. – Muboshgu (talk) 22:24, 9 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Discretionary sanctions notification

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in articles about living or recently deceased people, and edits relating to the subject (living or recently deceased) of such biographical articles. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

Woodroar (talk) 01:29, 10 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia policies and content about living persons

I suggest reading through our core content policies—that page, plus WP:V, WP:OR, and WP:NPOV—as well as WP:RS and WP:BLP before making any other edits to content involving living persons. You'll probably want to go through the links at the "Welcome!" message above, too. After that, please read through the discussions you've been involved in over the past couple of days. I'm saying this because you're clearly not reading and understanding our policies, or listening to what others are telling you. Adhering to our policies, especially when it comes to BLP, is not optional. If you continue to edit war poorly-sourced BLP content into these or any articles, I'm going to recommend that your editing rights be limited until you can learn more about what and why and how we do things on Wikipedia. Woodroar (talk) 12:34, 10 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]