User talk:Wikipelli/Archive 1

Archive 1

Archive 2

Archive 3

→

Archive 5

Standard welcome, overdue

Welcome!

Hello, Wikipelli, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you foryour contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• Tutorial
• How to edit a page and How to develop articles
• How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
• Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Pleasesign your messages on discussion pages using fourtildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! Studerby (talk) 19:27, 23 March 2010 (UTC)

Glad to see you stuck around

I see you've hung around after that issue of interest has resolved itself. Wikipedia always needs more editors, especially those that can keep cool, follow process, and edit it good faith when the conflict gets heated. Studerby (talk) 19:27, 23 March 2010 (UTC)

Thanks! I am feeling my way and overwhelmed when looking into the larger realm of articles. I was particularly disappointed in the article on Technology Integration (my forté). In looking at the edits and content, I think it probably ought to just be a section under Instructional Technology. I'm going slow, though. Thanks again (and I'm not sure if I reply to you here or not. On your talk page it would be out of context... oh well. I'll figure it out!Lacbolg (talk) 20:07, 23 March 2010 (UTC)

Reminder to warn vandals after you revert their edits...

Hi Wikipelli, I wanted to thank you for undoing vandalism on articles. While it isn't absolutely necessary, could you also please warn the vandal on their talk page with the related vandalism reversion templates (personally I use {{uw-vandalism1}} through {{uw-vandalism4}}). What this does is (1) give the user a warning that their behavior is undesirable and (2) gives administrators evidence that the user has been sufficiently warned that they could be blocked for creating vandalism.

If you knew all this and purposely weren't using those templates then I apologize. You look new enough that you might not know the entire process for vandalism reversion.

Thanks again for the tip! Syrthiss (talk) 12:29, 30 March 2010 (UTC)

Thank you! (I'm new enough that I don't know where to respond, really. Here or on *your* talk page.. ? )... I've been getting my feet wet (obviously) checking recent changes and only those of IP users (until I feel confident enough to undo logged in editors!). I am happy to use the warning template but haven't yet only because the undos have been on IP users that generally do not have talk pages. Should I go ahead and use it anyway?Wikipelli (talk) 12:36, 30 March 2010 (UTC)

Here is fine (so I've reverted you). Just wanted you to see that here is the right place to respond (at least to me ;), some other editors prefer you reply at their talk pages... usually they'll have a note or something on their talk page that indicates whichever they prefer). Yep, if they don't have anything on their talk page feel free to create that page and place the warnings. Thanks!

Will do! Thanks again!Wikipelli (talk) 12:46, 30 March 2010 (UTC)

Hey Wikipelli, as a lead on from this: firstly, thank you very much for your greatly needed help in the recent changes, when warning users who's edits you have reverted please add subst: in front of the template, for instance {{subst:uw-vandalism1}}See Wikipedia:Substitutionfor more information about this, or feel free to ask me about it. Again, thank you very much, kind regards, Spitfire^Tally-ho! 22:35, 30 March 2010 (UTC)

Thanks! Will do... learning all the time.. :) Wikipelli (talk) 22:37, 30 March 2010 (UTC)

Perfect, thanks. If you need any help with anything in future please feel free to let me know, kindest regards,Spitfire^Tally-ho! 22:46, 30 March 2010 (UTC)

Thanks again... I notice that several of those who clean up vandalism include warnings such as these but they refer specifically to the page and even the act (profanity, blanking, etc). Is that something that is contained in another template? A function of a bot? I like the specificity. Wikipelli (talk) 22:48, 30 March 2010 (UTC)

Wikipedia:WARN lists all the various warning templates that can be used, most of them work on the same basis as {{uw-vandalism1}}, in that they go up in levels from 1 to 4,Spitfire^Tally-ho! 22:57, 30 March 2010 (UTC)

Rollback

Snowolf ^{How can I help?} 03:34, 21 April 2010 (UTC)

User:H I T L E R37

Apparently he doesn't like you now. Apparently, he didn't notice that I reverted 2/3 of his edits, so you get to be vandalized. :) Hopefully, an admin will block him now. Hi878 (talk) 04:42, 25 April 2010 (UTC)

And he was blocked, right as I said that. :) Hi878 (talk) 04:43, 25 April 2010 (UTC)

What I want to know is how the guys on ACC interface passed his username as appropriate...Deagle_AP (talk) 04:45, 25 April 2010 (UTC)

Look at the reason for denying the unblocking request here. I like that rationale. :) Hi878 (talk) 05:10, 25 April 2010 (UTC)

Excellent.  :) Wikipelli ^Talk 05:13, 25 April 2010 (UTC)

Huggle

You use Huggle? Does that mean you are using some form of Wine, just so that you can run a Windows program??? I would expect more from an iMac user. :) Use Twinkle, orWikiGuard, don't go over to the dark side! Or should I say, you must leave the dark side, since you seem to already be there. :) Hi878 (talk) 05:01, 25 April 2010 (UTC)

:) Yeah, I'm on the dark side with my work laptop. I half-heartedly tried to get Wine working on my iMac, but it didn't go anywhere. I used Twinkle until I got rollback rights to use Huggle. I only go over to the 'dark side' late at night so no-one knows. Shhhhhh But I'm always looking to try new things... Wikipelli ^Talk 05:04, 25 April 2010 (UTC)

Unbelievable... Unlike you, I am a devoted Mac addict, so I would never do that. Even when I have to use a PC, I don't use Huggle (or any other PC-only program, for that matter), I go to all the trouble of installing Safari so that Twinkle works. And if I can't do that, I just undo vandalism the old-fashioned way. :) Hi878 (talk) 05:07, 25 April 2010 (UTC)

I almost feel guilty now. :) I work in a PC world, unfortunately, and like the speed of Huggle. BTW, I like Chrome better than Safari now for just about everything... I hate that I prefer it, though, if that helps. ;) Wikipelli ^Talk 05:09, 25 April 2010 (UTC)

Almost helps. :) All biases aside, I really think Chrome looks ugly. Almost everything else Google has made is perfect, in my opinion, but Chrome just... Is ugly. Even if it supposedly is way faster, or something like that, I prefer a browser that looks nicer to one that is uglier, but a little faster. Which is why I hate Firefox, it's ugly and slow. :) Hi878 (talk) 05:12, 25 April 2010 (UTC)

User talk:95.149.50.162

I believe your warning on the above page was inappropriate - the IP editor's contributions were clearly in good faith and not vandalism. DuncanHill (talk) 12:53, 25 April 2010 (UTC)

Thanks... I'll check it now. The phrasing on the link, "Visit their website" seemed out of place. Perhaps I was too quick. Thanks again. Wikipelli ^Talk 12:59, 25 April 2010 (UTC)

The IP editor is also learning, and guidance could help them. Rollback should only be used on blatant vandalism, which the edits were not. An undo, with an informative edit summary, and a personalised note with guidance on the editor's talk page would have been more appropriate.DuncanHill (talk) 13:09, 25 April 2010 (UTC)

Quite right. I see what you mean. Thank you! Wikipelli ^Talk 13:11, 25 April 2010 (UTC)

Thanks, DuncanHill (talk) 21:52, 25 April 2010 (UTC)

help: delete

Please delete this article completely. Recent privacy and safety concerns have come up regarding the articles content. I am asking for speedy deletion of:[[1]] Copyright issues are also present, but safety, and privacy should make sense. Thank you.

Heh

Nice Job with the Anti-vandalism. Just FYI this edit [2] was actually me, but no harm was done. Keep up the good work! Tim1357 ^talk 18:22, 27 April 2010 (UTC)

Barnstars!

Congrats on your first barnstar =) WikiTome ^Talk 08:49, 28 April 2010 (UTC)

Level 1

Hey Wikipelli, thanks for your help in fighting vandalism. Just a note: you don't have to stick to level 1 if a user hasn't been warned in a while. The IP that was butchering Terracotta Army, you could have given them a 2 or even 3 warning: there is a history of vandalism there, and you reverted no fewer than four vandal edits by them. It's not like one has to start with level 1 and then work up one step at the time--sometimes 4im is appropriate, sometimes a level 3 is a good place to begin, dependent on history and the nature of the edit. All the best, Drmies (talk) 03:18, 7 May 2010 (UTC)

Thanks! Using (and getting used to) Huggle and learning to read the icons to see previous warnings and previous contribs (vandal and otherwise) from IPs... I'll get better at it.  :) thanks again! Wikipelli^Talk 03:20, 7 May 2010 (UTC)

I'm not familiar with Huggle--I installed it once but it was too complicate. I use Twinkle, and occasionally I have another glance at Wikipedia:UTM#Warnings_and_notices to remind me of what's what. Thanks, Drmies (talk) 03:24, 7 May 2010 (UTC)

San Jose

I've EC'd with you a few times so I'll let you clean it up - but the article right now is essentially doubled up.  7  03:51, 7 May 2010 (UTC)

arggg... Sorry... I think it's ok now. Wikipelli ^Talk 03:53, 7 May 2010 (UTC)

No apologies! You got to it faster than me, while I was off RPPing it. Looks good now. Thanks. 7  04:00, 7 May 2010 (UTC)

Igloo

I've found a way to make you stop using PC-only programs! Igloo is a pretty new vandal-fighting tool, but I've been using it for a little while now, and it works amazingly. You should get that, and then pick the UBX that I made to display on your userpage. :) Oh, I got Rollback, by the way. (I don't remember if you knew that or not. :)) Anyhoo, CONVERT TO IGLOO! Come back to the light side! Hi878 (talk) 04:37, 7 May 2010 (UTC)

Thanks.... I'm waiting to get on the whitelist. I'll use anything that's better on my Mac.  :) Wikipelli^Talk 01:44, 8 May 2010 (UTC)

Yes! I did it! Hi878 (talk) 04:05, 8 May 2010 (UTC)

Thanks

Thanks for the cleanup. I was doing the ANI on him. Niteshift36 (talk) 18:55, 7 May 2010 (UTC)

No charge.  :) Wikipelli ^Talk 18:56, 7 May 2010 (UTC)

Flag of Georgia

Well, you are very welcome! I'm somewhat of a flag hobbyist, myself, and recognized the flag instantly as the country, as opposed to the state. I've only just started dabbling in wikipedia, cleaning up some vandalism, so it's nice to see my time on the wiki wasn't completely wasted. By the way, I love your user name. :D -- 99.101.47.164 (talk) 01:46, 8 May 2010 (UTC)

:) I think I did the flags late one night and really must not have been paying attention. I'm a big fan of all things Kokopelli - the username just sort of happened here ....Welcome! and thanks again!Wikipelli^Talk 01:49, 8 May 2010 (UTC)

Templates removed because they were placed there maliciously or erroneously.

I apologize for making the edit to the Globcal page, I know one of the students that interns with them, I am a university professor. I only made the edit because it appears that someone placed it there to create doubt about what these people are doing in creating an international cooperative; but it was also because the templates refer to dead ends. Well that is all up to you guys if you want to run people in circles and have erroneous info on Wikipedia thats up to you.

The templates refer to a discussion and dispute that are non-existent.

"The neutrality of this article is disputed. Please see the discussion on the talk page. Please do not remove this message until the dispute is resolved. (February 2010)"

What dispute? Nothing on the Talk page about a discussion or dispute.

"This article needs additional citations for verification. Please help improve this article by adding reliable references. Unsourced material may be challenged and removed."

Maybe as a Wiki Editor you should go back and revert the guys edits that placed them there.

Whats wrong with the references they are reliable and valid?186.89.245.149 (talk) 15:26, 8 May 2010 (UTC)

The references are ok as far as they go, but there is no citation or reference in the article that speaks about Globcal specifically. There are only references to Facebook Diplomacy, Social Diplomacy, etc. There are no references that indicate that the organization exists at all. Wikipelli ^Talk 01:36, 9 May 2010 (UTC)

Your page has been conquered by the Earth Cabal!

Hello. I am here to inform you that your userpage or talk page has been conquered by theEarth Cabal. Please don’t panic; there is nothing you can do about it. You are hereby invited to join the Cabal, and help conquer other pages for our cause. SeeUser:Hi878/Earth Cabal for more information. Thank you, have a nice, irregular weather day, and welcome to Earth. Hi878 (talk) 04:31, 9 May 2010 (UTC)

igloo

Thanks for your interest in igloo. I've added you to the script whitelist, so if you now try and run the program it should allow you to connect. I'm very busy atm, but any feedback or suggestions are still welcome. Ale_Jrb^talk11:11, 9 May 2010 (UTC)

Edit to House of Commons

But it was a fact?! 82.42.115.39 (talk) 23:09, 11 May 2010 (UTC)

Good work

		The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
		Great work with huggle. :) I enjoy working with you Tommy2010 02:21, 18 May 2010 (UTC)

:) Thanks! You, too.. I feel like I pick up your leftovers. You're always one step ahead of me. Wikipelli^Talk 02:22, 18 May 2010 (UTC)

I try :) Tommy201002:52, 18 May 2010 (UTC)

Thank you

Thank you for reverting vandalism on my user talk page. Immunize (talk) 17:36, 18 May 2010 (UTC)

No charge!  :) You've caught some for me, too. Wikipelli ^Talk 17:48, 18 May 2010 (UTC)

Thank you

		The Userpage Shield
		Thank you for reverting the vandalism on my User page! SeaphotoTalk22:55, 18 May 2010 (UTC)

Never a problem!  :) (from a Navy brat :) ) Wikipelli ^Talk 23:00, 18 May 2010 (UTC)

Careful...

Remember not to add the vandalism back into an article, as you did[3].Immunize (talk) 13:09, 20 May 2010 (UTC)

and huggle warned me, too.  :( I thought I was just restoring that paragraph and didn't look closely enough at the one above it. Thanks! Wikipelli ^Talk 13:11, 20 May 2010 (UTC)

Igloo

So, are you going to start using Igloo? You were put on the whitelist a while ago, and now you don't even need to be on that to use it. You really should use it, not this PC-only garbage. :PHi878 (talk) 19:08, 23 May 2010 (UTC)

Eh... I'm not liking the interface so much. I might be spoiled by huggle. I'm a Mac Zealot, but I'll use the superior tool no matter what platform it's on. :) I'll keep working with igloo.... there might be some settings I can change. Wikipelli ^Talk 22:21, 27 May 2010 (UTC)

Haha

awww did I upset someone :(?  – Tommy2010 23:26, 23 May 2010 (UTC)

:) It would appear... Wikipelli ^Talk 23:28, 23 May 2010 (UTC)

Thanks

		The Userpage Shield
		Thanks for reverting the vandalism on my Talk page - looks like quite a nasty character there -- Boing! said Zebedee 14:11, 24 May 2010 (UTC)

Paul Gray (American musician)

I can assure you no malice was intended in my edit - I put a template that needed to be on the page one paragraph beneath where I should have put it, that's all. I sort of resent being told that an amateurish mistake is non-constructive as if I'd vandalised. Whatever happened toWP:GF?DrFishcake (talk) 21:55, 24 May 2010 (UTC)

I've removed the warning. I checked the diffs and there's no way I would have labeled your edit as vandalism. The only thing I can say in my defense is that the edits were coming so fast that I might have clicked revert for one edit and yours came in before it took effect. My apologies. :) Wikipelli ^Talk 22:01, 24 May 2010 (UTC)

Apology very much accepted. Thanks for clarifying your actions.DrFishcake(talk) 22:05, 24 May 2010 (UTC)

Fantastic! Thank you!

		The Userpage Shield
		Thank You so much for reverting the vandalism on my userpage! Keep up the fantastic job. -- Matthew Glennon(T/C\D) 15:55, 25 May 2010 (UTC)

Bog turtle

Thanks for taking care of that bit of vandalism on the bog turtle article. Much appreciated.--NYMFan69-86 (talk) 21:33, 25 May 2010 (UTC)

No charge.  :) Wikipelli ^Talk 21:51, 25 May 2010 (UTC)

;) --NYMFan69-86 (talk) 00:08, 26 May 2010 (UTC)

Latin America

Hi! I am having a little problem in the article Latin America with editor SamEV about Brazilian demographics. The main article about Brazil explains that the "Pardo" population is a a broad category that includes sub-categories such as the Mullattoes, Caboclos (known as "Mestizos" in Hispanic-America) and Cafuzos (known as "Zambo" in Hispanic America). In the Latin America article there is a table that says that 39.1% of Brazilian population are "mulatto" when the correct should be "Pardo". I explained that carefully in the talk page (See Talk:Latin America#Conflict with editor SamEV) but editor SamEV not only ignored my remarks but insist on reverting all my edits. I also tried to reach his in his own talk page but he simply erased my message. That is not a helpful behavior of his. I should had simply requested to an administrator to block him per the 3 eevert rules and asked for an arbitration since his behaving as his owns the article. However, I want to avoid that since the issue is something very simple, that is, nothing more than to clarify the table that present Brazilian demographics. As it is know, it says that there are 0% Caboclos or Mestizos (the majority of the population in Northern Region, Brazil, Northeast Region, BrazilandCentral-West Region, Brazil) and 0% Cafuzos or Zambos. Could you, please, share your thoughts about it in the article talk page? Thank you very much, --Lecen (talk) 10:42, 27 May 2010 (UTC)

i didnt edit the lady charles benidict page

i didnt edit the lady charles benidict page, and yet i got a message saying my edit had been reverted, i didnt even EDIT it... —Precedingunsigned comment added by24.21.66.76(talk) 10:06, 29 May 2010 (UTC)

Good morning! When someone edits an article and they don't have an account (or are not logged in), their IP address is recorded in the history of the page. Someone might have edited the article from your computer or, if you're in a school or business, from the same network. Wikipelli ^Talk 11:18, 29 May 2010 (UTC)

User talk:98.140.187.172

This User is editing pages with false information to vandalize articles. Can the IP address be blocked?La Fuzion (talk) 17:57, 1 June 2010 (UTC)

It can, but not by me, unfortunately. I'm watching the account now. They'll be reported next time.Wikipelli^Talk 18:02, 1 June 2010 (UTC)

I'll alert you to anything else. Appreciate your prompt response. La Fuzion(talk) 18:12, 1 June 2010 (UTC)

The IP has been blocked. Wikipelli ^Talk 21:27, 1 June 2010 (UTC)

Grab some glory, and a barnstar

Hi, I'd like to invite you to participate in the Guild of Copy Editors July 2010 Backlog Elimination Drive. In May, about 30 editors helped remove the {{copyedit}} tag from 1175 articles. The backlog is still over 7500 articles, and extends back to the beginning of 2008! We really need your help to reduce it. Copyediting just a couple articles can qualify you for a barnstar. Serious copyeditors can win prestigious and exclusive rewards. See the event page for more information. And thanks for your consideration. monosock 03:56, 12 June 2010 (UTC)

Why am I getting this message? Mono's delivery method is random, so you probably showed up somewhere Mono went. :)

Barnstar

		The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
		Please continue making constructive edits on Wikipedia. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism reverting and have earned you a barnstar. If you would like to get more, please keep using Huggle. Thank you.dffgd (talk) 20:51, 21 June 2010 (UTC)

Reverting vandalism

Hi. I see you have reverted an edit on the article Total Drama World Tour. However, as much as it sounds like the team name would be vandalism, it actually isn't. I agree that it would seem like vandalism, but it isn't. It actually is the team name. I know that it can easily be mistaken as vandalism, but it isn't. I put a section on the talk page of the article, by the way, on if we should add the full team name or not. Don't worry about what you reverted, because it can be easily mistaken as vandalism. --Hadger 21:40, 22 June 2010 (UTC)

Sorry. I just noticed that a piece of the edit you reverted was vandalism, which makes it eveneasier to think that the whole edit would've been vandalism. As I said before, though, don't worry about it. --Hadger 21:42, 22 June 2010 (UTC)

Well, I'd be lying if I said I understood all that, but it sounds like I got the vandalism. Cheers. Wikipelli^Talk 18:54, 23 June 2010 (UTC)

Sorry. Sometimes I get hard to understand. By the way, you're right. You did get the vandalism. I'm just saying that the "Team Chris is Really Really Really Really Hot" part isn't vandalism (hard to believe, but that part wasn't vandalism). At first, that was the only part I saw on the edit you reverted, but then when I saw the full edit, I understood why you reverted it. --Hadger 23:43, 23 June 2010 (UTC)

Fat Bastard edit

The piece of information i added to this page was in fact true so why was it deleted.

P.S. I would like a reply

yours sincerely James Noonan —Preceding unsigned comment added by 95jaynoonlfc5 (talk•contribs) 19:21, 23 June 2010 (UTC)

Because of Wikipedia:Neutral point of view. Moocha (talk) 19:23, 23 June 2010 (UTC)

It is your opinion and not fact. Another person might not see the resemblance. Wikipelli ^Talk 19:25, 23 June 2010 (UTC)

someone was on this account editting things so do not dleat this accoutnt. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Bob 3331 (talk • contribs) 21:54, 8 July 2010 (UTC)

Where've you been??

I miss huggling with you! Tommy!18:21, 13 September 2010 (UTC)

Thanks! I've missed it, too. I'm a school teacher and my summers off are just that... off the computer! I did some traveling and spending time with family. I have a new position this year (elementary school) so that's taking some time, too. I'll be back at it before long... once the colder weather hits! Wikipelli ^Talk 20:48, 13 September 2010 (UTC)

Ugh, elementary teachers have so much work!!! That's interesting, I'm going to be a Spanish teacher (HS)... one step at a time ... blah. Good job and good luck! Tommy! 20:57, 13 September 2010 (UTC)

Advance my Athlete

Hello,

I am an employee of Advance My Athlete and the reason I am updating these wiki pages is to help inform the public that these athletes are involved with our business and are major contributors to it. They have spent a lot of time in the last 9 months providing content for us, which I believe would be something that users would like to be aware of. I am not trying to spam these pages, and if the content I am providing has been done so in the wrong way, please let me know. Otherwise everything I am adding is credible truthful information, but unfortunately does not have a reference to cite.

Thank you,

Shane Larkin —Preceding unsigned comment added by Shane390 (talk•contribs) 17:04, 14 September 2010 (UTC)

I have to agree with Resolute's comments on your talk page. The information that you are including in so many pages is, in my opinion, promotional in nature. That aside, as an employee you have a conflict of interest.Wikipelli ^Talk 19:18, 14 September 2010 (UTC)

Cobalt

Please check your edits after you use huggle or other automatic tools! --Stone (talk) 18:03, 19 October 2010 (UTC)

A very embarrassing miss! Thanks! Wikipelli ^Talk 18:17, 19 October 2010 (UTC)

Hello

When you type in Post Oak Middle School in to the search box, you get into the Spotsylvania County Public Schools subsection Post Oak Middle. Now, I have created the Wiki page Post Oak Middle School, Virginia which looks great by the way. However, I want people when they type in Post Oak Middle School, I want them to go to the Wiki page Post Oak Middle School, Virginia. <br.

What Should I do?

Please reply in my talk page! Thanks Arman Cagle ^{(Contact me EMail MeContribs)} Please remember if you have any questions, please reply on my talk page. 21:01, 3 November 2010 (UTC)Arman Cagle

William Walker (soldier) -> William Walker (filibuster)

The page has that title so why do you revert my correction. You must put them back now.204.174.87.29 (talk) 18:31, 5 November 2010 (UTC)

William Walker (soldier)

Since you haven't answer my message after your four totally inapropriate messages I have placed a complaint against you at the wikipedia bureau.204.174.87.29(talk) 18:43, 5 November 2010 (UTC)

) I'm unfamiliar with the wikipedia 'bureau' and I don't respond well to commands that I restore changes that I have made. Since your initial 'orders', I have been checking back over the changes. I am more than willing to correct any mistakes that I have made, but only after I have sufficiently reviewed them. The changes appeared to me to be vandalism since the term 'filibuster' is not generally an occupation (ie. Tom Jones (entertainer) or Barrack Obama (politician). From my reading of the material, 'soldier' appeared to be the more appropriate label since it is an occupation. Again, I'm reviewing the changes and I will be more than happy to revert them if I feel they were in error.Wikipelli^Talk 19:01, 5 November 2010 (UTC)

I'm willing to concede that 'filibuster' is more appropriate than 'soldier' and I will restore that on the pages that I changed. I would ask (note the difference between asking and ordering here), that you first register and get an account. IP changes, unfortunately, are sometimes more suspect-conversely, changes by a registered user are not edited so quickly. Be that as it may, no matter what type of account you use, you might benefit from putting an explanation with your changes. Finally, please ask nicely if you feel something you've done has been wrongly changed. I'm reasonable and I do make mistakes. Wikipelli ^Talk 19:17, 5 November 2010 (UTC)

Thanks. 204.174.87.29 (talk) 19:20, 5 November 2010 (UTC)

Block

Hi. At the very point at which you were giving this user a final warning, I was blocking him for two weeks as a vandalism only account!! No disrespect intended. If you would rather follow the "final warning" route, I can rescind my block.Fainites^barleyscribs16:25, 8 November 2010 (UTC)

no worries. I generally go by the numbers but if you feel the block is warrented, by all means. Wikipelli^Talk 16:27, 8 November 2010 (UTC)

777hotmail

Thanks for flagging this account! I've blocked it indefinitely. --A. B. ^{(talk • contribs)} 19:24, 10 November 2010 (UTC)

Well, when they specifically ask you to ban them, what else can you do? <smile> Wikipelli ^Talk 11:42, 11 November 2010 (UTC)

Protus

Why'd you revert the page blank? That usually is taken to signify the creator assents to deletion. If I'd seen the page blank, I'd have not undertaken a rescue attempt. Dlohcierekim23:22, 2 December 2010 (UTC)

yeah, I see that now. I didn't notice that the deletion tag had been there prior to the page blanking. Wikipelli ^Talk 12:19, 3 December 2010 (UTC)

Thanks...

...for taking care of my talk page & Captain Adverb. Cheers,Lindsay^Hi 16:02, 6 December 2010 (UTC)

No trouble. Pretty ignorant individual. Wikipelli ^Talk 16:05, 6 December 2010 (UTC)

Greetings and thanks!

Greetings Wikipelli. Thanks for keeping an eye out. IOU1. Cheers! --Technopat(talk) 14:22, 9 December 2010 (UTC)

No charge. :) Wikipelli ^Talk 14:24, 9 December 2010 (UTC)

Archive 1

Archive 2

Archive 3

→

Archive 5