User talk:Wikipediatoperfection
Thanks for the 3O, but could you take another look I have requested removing one thing. Thanks! House1090 (talk) 22:38, 1 February 2010 (UTC)
- Could you take a look here: [1] That is where I got a third opinion or some one that agrees with me, to say. I wrote it in the edit summary, and User:SoCal L.A. sstill reverted me but I do not know what to do I think I am going to request a block or something on him/her. I will give you more linke to where he reverted me w/ no excuse if you want them. House1090 (talk) 00:52, 2 February 2010 (UTC)
- Sorry but I was no edit warring, I only revert once and stop. I just hate false info on articles. I just dont want to get into more trouble you know thats why I am asking for help, and third opinions. But I truely think that SoCal L.A. thinks hes the owner of wikipedia and he can keep information that he wants even though when two users are against one (him)/im talking about his edit dont take this the wrong way. I gess I will let this cool down, wait a while unti I get more responses and I might end up reporting him to an admin. if he keeps it up. But I dont want to be mean. So I think I will let it slide for a now. What do you think House1090 (talk) 01:25, 2 February 2010 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:34, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
Nomination of Working majority for deletion
[edit]
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Working majority is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Working majority until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Bangalamania (talk) 19:49, 3 September 2019 (UTC)
"Surrender of Germany" listed at Redirects for discussion
[edit]
A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Surrender of Germany. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 June 11#Surrender of Germany until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. — Mr. Guye (talk) (contribs) 20:21, 11 June 2020 (UTC)