User talk:Wikipediaman17826

October 2016

Hello, I'm Optakeover. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to Xbox 360 technical problems— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Optakeover^(U)(T)(C) 02:51, 20 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

How did you delete it so quick. Also,what the heck is a vandalism and why has it happened to you 52 times? Wikipediaman17826 (talk) 03:13, 20 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You need to find reliable sources for the things you add to Wikipedia. Optakeover^(U)(T)(C) 03:20, 20 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Ok got it. I'm more curious on how you found it so quick and what a vandalism is Wikipediaman17826 (talk) 03:21, 20 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Kevin Lepage incident

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Kevin Lepage incident requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about something invented/coined/discovered by the article's creator or someone they know personally, and it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Everymorning (talk) 03:21, 20 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

October 2016

Please do not remove speedy deletion notices from pages you have created yourself, as you did with Kevin Lepage incident. If you believe the page should not be deleted, you may contest the deletion by clicking on the button that says: Contest this speedy deletion, which appears inside the speedy deletion notice. This will allow you to make your case on the page's talk page. Administrators will consider your reasoning before deciding what to do with the article. Thank you. Optakeover^(U)(T)(C) 03:27, 20 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding your articles

Hi Wikipediaman17826, please read this carefully. Some editors, including I, have concerns about the articles you have created. Please read Wikipedia:Your first article and also understand Wikipedia's policies on notability, no original research and reliable sources. Creating articles which do not satisfy Wikipedia's policies or guidelines for inclusion can result in them being deleted, and you getting into trouble for repeatedly creating such articles.

Also, please take note I have restored the content you said you deleted on Hedrick middle school. Is this what you wanted? Optakeover^(U)(T)(C) 03:30, 20 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop removing speedy deletion notices from pages that you have created yourself, as you did with this edit to Kevin Lepage incident. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. Optakeover^(U)(T)(C) 03:33, 20 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Wikipediaman17826. To contest a speedy deletion, visit the article talk page, in this case Talk:Kevin Lepage incident, and you can give your reason there. Please follow the instructions on the speedy deletion template message. Optakeover^(U)(T)(C) 03:34, 20 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of "Gilbar C Hedrick"

Gilbar C Hedrick, a page you created, has been tagged for deletion, as it meets one or more of the criteria for speedy deletion; specifically, it is vandalism.

You are welcome to contribute content that complies with our content policies and any applicable inclusion guidelines. However, please do not simply re-create the page with the same content, or remove the speedy deletion tag from the page. You can contest the deletion by clicking the "Contest this speedy deletion" button inside the speedy deletion tag. You may also wish to read our introduction to editing and guide to writing your first article.

Thank you. Donner60 (talk) 03:36, 20 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Kevin Lepage incident, you may be blocked from editing. Tolly 4 bolly 03:37, 20 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Lewisville High School. Donner60 (talk) 03:37, 20 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

October 2016

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to introduce inappropriate pages to Wikipedia, as you did at Gilbar C Hedrick, you may be blocked from editing. If you need guidance on how to create appropriate pages, try using the Article Wizard. Please stop creating random articles, with no sources or proof to back your articles up. Such behaviour is considered disruptive. Optakeover^(U)(T)(C) 03:39, 20 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please see Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not and Wikipedia:Words to watch. Wikipedia is not a blog, forum, fan site, advice site, or publisher of original research or opinion. It is an encyclopedia publishing significant facts about the subjects of articles based on reliable, verifiable, third-party sources. It does not include original research or conclusions, personal opinions, commentary, speculation, suggestions, directions or advice to the reader, rumors or unsourced information or disparaging information any of which is likely to be changed, challenged, disputed or wrong. See Wikipedia:Five Pillars, Wikipedia:Identifying reliable sources, Help:Footnotes, Wikipedia:Verifiability, Wikipedia:No original research, Wikipedia:Neutral point of view and Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons. For further information about contributing to Wikipedia, see: Getting started; Introduction to Wikipedia; Wikipedia:Simplified ruleset; and Wikipedia:Simplified Manual of Style. Thank you. Donner60 (talk) 03:42, 20 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

Materialscientist (talk) 03:46, 20 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]