User talk:Wikipédien-franco-australien

Changes to ISAAC_(cipher)

One of your edits to ISAAC (cipher) was very concerning as it leads to people completely misunderstanding the subject of the article (which, in the field of cryptography, is a very dangerous and a very real problem problem). See Talk:ISAAC_(cipher) If you are not qualified enough to understand the context, or the references you may link, please be honest with yourself about that and not make any edits in those fields.

I'm not trying to give you a hard time about not understanding this field fully (I have no doubt that you understand many things that I don't), but please, "stay in your lane" for the sake of everyone else that may be trying to learn via wikipedia. Statistics and cryptography is very sensitive. If you inadvertently mislead people on wikipedia, that's increasingly dangerous.

Again, I'm not trying to give you a hard time, but please do your best to keep wikipedia clear of such information. Millions if not billions of information seekers rely on it. 73.217.103.80 (talk) 00:30, 11 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Dear anonymous,

you will never read this, but your revert was based on your own, unsourced, personal opinion.

On the other hand, my additions to the page were properly sourced knowledge matching the Wikipedia policies.

I'll review your comments of course and re-add my content once properly verified.

If you disagree, feel free to provide appropriate sources and/or credentials. Wikipédien-franco-australien (talk) 02:09, 24 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]