User talk:Wikimarruttman

Welcome!

Hello, Wikimarruttman, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! RJFJR 16:48, 27 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Your edit to Conservative Party (UK)

Please do not add commentary or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to Conservative Party (UK). Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. Gwernol 17:56, 23 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Doctor Who Online, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be blatant advertising which only promotes a company, product, group or service and which would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the general criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item 11, as well as the guidelines on spam.

If you can indicate why the subject of this article is not blatant advertising, you may contest the tagging. To do this, please add {{hangon}} on the top of the page and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would help make it encyclopedic, as well as adding any citations from reliable sources to ensure that the article will be verifiable. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. NipokNek 17:22, 7 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Please do not remove speedy deletion tags from articles that you have created yourself, as you did with Doctor Who Online. If you do not believe the article deserves to be deleted, then please place {{hangon}} on the page (Please do not remove any existing speedy deletion tag) and make your case on the article's talk page. Administrators will look at your reasoning before deciding what to do with the article. Thank you. NipokNek 17:22, 7 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Doctor Who Online

Your promt recreation of the Doctor Who Online article after its deletion is likely to be ill-met. I am not a stool pigeon, so I won't call this page to anyone's attention. My advise is to get busy and find the verifiable sources needed to establish notability before this article again becomes the focus of negative attention.--House of Scandal 10:51, 14 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You have recently recreated or reposted material at Doctor Who Online which previously was deleted in accordance with Wikipedia's deletion policies. Please do not recreate this article without prior approval from an administrator or you may be blocked from editing. We ask that you respect what Wikipedia is not. If you disagree with the article's deletion, which was reached by consensus at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Doctor Who Online, you may seek an independent deletion review. —Josiah Rowe (talk • contribs) 18:50, 14 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Your repeated attempt at re-creating Doctor Who Online is both misguided and futile. The page has now been protected against re-creation. Don't try to recreate the page under another title either — if you do, you will be blocked. As I said above, if you wish to challenge the article's deletion, the proper way to do so is through deletion review. Please respect Wikipedia's deletion processes, which are based on consensus. Thank you. —Josiah Rowe (talk • contribs) 22:02, 15 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Torchwood Script Series

A tag has been placed on Torchwood Script Series requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for web content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the article (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Stephenb (Talk) 16:38, 23 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not delete content from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to User talk:NawlinWiki, without explaining the reason for the removal in the edit summary. Unexplained removal of content does not appear constructive, and your edit has been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox for test edits. Thank you. Metros (talk) 17:47, 23 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Nicholas M. Brook

A tag has been placed on Nicholas M. Brook requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Ridernyc (talk) 12:26, 3 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]